Thats not a Real NSX...
Not very impressive. Isn't nearly as lightweight as the rest are and 280hp out of a 3.5ltr? Nissan got 287hp out of a 3.5ltr 5 years ago and it's in their 29,000 base model 350z. I seriously doubt this engine will have significantly more torque either. Too much compromise IMO.
It is in my fundamental eyes. Let's see what the supercharged version will yield...
I agree that VQ would make a distinctive note, but there are too many vehicles using that already. Maximas, Altimas, SUVs, even the damn Van uses a variant. So it doesn't sound so bad when a Camry engine is modded for a sports car. Perhap the VHR, G37's engine would have been nice, but supposedly any of the VQ are decently heavy anyways.
Lets see;
V-6
Mid-engined rear drive
+ or - 3000 lbs
Aluminum construction.
No that's right an NSX has 10 cylinders and is front engined. Thanks for the clarification.
My point is you titled this thread pics of the Real NSX...more of a misnomer. Just disagree with the title of your thread.
I have seen this car somewhere else on NSXPrime, It reminds me a little bit of the HSC.
lol, you're like one of those baby crying about what Honda is NOT going to make for you.
Tell me, do you own an NSX, did you buy it new?
If the answer is NO for either or both, why should Honda listen to you?
Yea, I think Honda can acheive anything if they push their designers and engineers to raise for the occasion. They surprised the world with a rear wheel drive (coming from a company that usually makes FF cars) AND mid-engine EXOTIC that redefined the genre. I believe Honda has the power to introduce another revolutionary masterpiece, but apparently the direction for the current Halo car is a bit on the SAFE side or rather, unappealing in the eyes of other beloved exotics. Hey, at least the interior will look awesome based on the current TL interior.
I didn't title this thread anything. Learn to read and comprehend before you start pointing fingers. In fact I agree with you on the REAL part being misleading. I like to call it the fundamental NSX.
What Honda did is like most of the Japanese companies, perfect it.
If the MR layout is so wonderful, why did every pre NSX MR cars drive like ASS?
What Honda did was make the impossible possible.
I don't believe the FR layout is a safe route, rather Honda is going to attempt making a different masterpiece to show the world that 599/SLR Vision/Mr. Martin are NOT the greatest FR car in the world.
Honda is not in the business of making only super cars, but it's a hobby for them - Making statements, show off what they can do, and give F/P/L designers the middle finger. When Honda make a statement, it usually take other manufactures 10 to 12 years to catch up.
For example:
1. 1995 to 2001 Integra type R and Prelude Type-S (JDM) are still considered as the greatest handling FF car in the world. In fact, it out handles most of the FR cars in the world even today.
2. The formula for FF cars such as Accord/TSX/TL is still some thing that other manufacture like to achieve. Value/Workmanship/Performance.
3. NSX, created in 1991, was significantly better than any Ferrari until F430, Porsche 997, and Lamborghini Gallardo. All created after 2003.
4. Even though Honda F1 is in the toilet today, their six consecutive engine Manufacture's championship is only matched by Ferrari till this decade.
5. Honda VTEC is first 100hp/Liter NA engine in the world, reliability is unmatched by any other manufactures, including BMW.
it just seems that the current incarnation of the NSX replacement is not visually appealling to many people, hence the so many complaints from NSX or non-NSX owners. I'm sure there will be a new market group that purchases the new GT when it releases though.
Have you seen the NSX replacement in actual production form? Or any one?
lol, you're like one of those baby crying about what Honda is NOT going to make for you.
Tell me, do you own an NSX, did you buy it new?
If the answer is NO for either or both, why should Honda listen to you?
No; no NSX but i like to pretend i'm someone when racing one on the X-box.
One of these days when i grow up i'm going to get one and rice it just like you.
Cause them stoopid engineers didnt know what they were doing in the first place. i'm a lot smerter.
But if i were a reel adult i would have given up on Honda and placed an order with Lotus a long time ago for the next reel NSX Cause Honda got lost somewhere along the way.
Have fun with you're Viper clone.
I agree with much of what Vance said and that its unfair to judge a car that doesn't even exist yet. However, I think the problem that people are having (including myself) loved the design philosophy of Shigeru Uehara. Not only this but with Ken Okuyama as the Chief Designer, how much better could things get?
Under previous designers and leadership Honda has proven its self with the NSX, ITR, Prelude, all pre 2000 civics are still tearing up both drag and track events, and finally the s2000 the last drivers car Honda produced.
We are faced with skeptism because under Fukui, Honda has strayed away from its roots and he has yet to proove himself.
I'll wait patiently to cast my final judgement but so far the cars Honda has produced in the last couple years are far from impressive or inspiring.
No; no NSX but i like to pretend i'm someone when racing one on the X-box.
One of these days when i grow up i'm going to get one and rice it just like you.
Cause them stoopid engineers didnt know what they were doing in the first place. i'm a lot smerter.
But if i were a reel adult i would have given up on Honda and placed an order with Lotus a long time ago for the next reel NSX Cause Honda got lost somewhere along the way.
Have fun with you're Viper clone.
Wow. Joke post
Just like the title.:wink: