my friend just got a 1988 supra and he claims to say stocked its faster than a 91' acura nsx is that true or not?? i kno this is off topic but i want to know alot of ppls opinions
nsx vs supra
- Thread starter BullrunNSX
- Start date
A 1988 supra? That's not even a real supra. Glorified Celica more like it..
16 second turd.
16 second turd.
Last edited:
16 sec turd hahah
shawn110975
Suspended
hahah the NSX beat the Ferrari 355 for that year.
watch this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU4xD7-SUa4
if a stock Celica/ uhummm.. Supra can beat a Ferrari 355
then Im mother goose
heres another one for ya. stock NSX beats a Viper
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJOXeP4JBeA&feature=related
heres one more
Stock NSX beats a Porsche 911
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95Bh3Mwg3Qg&feature=related
heres that same NSX beating a Turbo Supra ( I think something was wrong with the supra but still a win). LoL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYYhHdFVAAk
But some say the NSX is a glorified Civic
.
watch this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU4xD7-SUa4
if a stock Celica/ uhummm.. Supra can beat a Ferrari 355
then Im mother goose
heres another one for ya. stock NSX beats a Viper
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJOXeP4JBeA&feature=related
heres one more
Stock NSX beats a Porsche 911
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95Bh3Mwg3Qg&feature=related
heres that same NSX beating a Turbo Supra ( I think something was wrong with the supra but still a win). LoL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYYhHdFVAAk
But some say the NSX is a glorified Civic
.
Last edited:
thx man i enjoyed those vids.. i just posted 2 pics of my nsx in the vid and pic gallery
- Joined
- 19 March 2003
- Messages
- 3,442
I hate to say it but stock for stock yes an MKIV will pull a stock NSX. I have driven both and have my comparisons. I am reffering to a 91 to 2001 NSX.
shawn110975
Suspended
those pics you posted ,, WTF its my exact car. but mine is a 92 LOL the same rims color etc.
funny. but do you have a 2005 Acura TL Navi installed in a SOS pod.
I do. lol
I love black cars but keeping them clean is a BITC......H
how much did you pay for yours?
I got mine for 21K 2 years ago
funny. but do you have a 2005 Acura TL Navi installed in a SOS pod.
I do. lol
I love black cars but keeping them clean is a BITC......H
how much did you pay for yours?
I got mine for 21K 2 years ago
Last edited:
no navi installed.. obo 32k
i'm surprised that viper lost. anyway, I'd agree that a stock MKIV turbo would would beat a stock NSX, but a MK III Turbo likely wouldn't.
yea
I don't see why you're suprised, I've seen plenty run and bone stock they're around the 13.90-14.0 range.
my buddy races my nsx and he beats g35's and 1 z06 mitsubishi lancer evos
shawn110975
Suspended
your telling me that this 1988 supra can beat this Ferrari I dont think so.
Last edited:
Yeah a Mark 3 Supra is a real turd, and will not beat a NA1 5 speed NSX. Now if your comparing a USDM Mark IV Supra TT, then yes it is faster than any USDM NSX. The JDM Supra's are less powerful than the USDM ones so the Best Motoring Videos that you see are inaccurate of how fast they were.
A stock MK IV Supra TT can out gripe, out slalom, out brake, and out accelerate a NA2 6 speed NSX.
A stock MK IV Supra TT can out gripe, out slalom, out brake, and out accelerate a NA2 6 speed NSX.
shawn110975
Suspended
and if an NSX can beat this Ferrari then NO a 1988 Supra can not beat a NSX.
now the next gen maybe, but the last gen I am sure the supra could dominate
now the next gen maybe, but the last gen I am sure the supra could dominate
I'm going to go a head and call BS on this. That is not a stock NSX. It trapped 117 mph. That has some serious mods. Like super or turbocharged. Please make sure you know what you speak of before you speak.
A stock Viper from any year will beat an NSX from any year in a straight line, given equally skilled drivers.
I would consider it to be a driver's race with a 93+ Supra Turbo.
Those gen Supra's definitely weren't turds. This was the 1980s. There acceleration was in line with everyone else.
Last edited:
I'm skeptical of BMI videos, so I would view the results with a grain of salt. The NSX is known to be quicker all around than a 348 but the 355 is a faster car. Also the modifications of the NSX trapping 117mph is unknown, but the Viper posted about what it should have.
0.02
my nsx or on the vids on youtube??
My nsx is much faster than my non turbo 2jz although i was beaten by a trailblazer in the NSX
Tell me about it, I lost to a modded Ram 1500 at the drag strip because I messed up my launch (thinking it was an easy kill) and he got me by a few cars. I trapped higher than him and I was catching him but the race wasn't long enough.
The youtube vid. It is clear that isn't stock.
Ehh 2nd Gen Vipers usually run mid-low 12's driven decently. One running a 12.9 is a below average time. Although the car is tricky to get off the line so newer drivers will run these sort of times.
The trailblazer ss had i/e and it was very cold out and i got 275´s. He beat me by a lenth + 2ft or so, aero and gearing wise a longer race would of helped in my case to
are there any vids of an nsx racing a lambo gallardo?
tht would be a good race i think
tht would be a good race i think
Similar threads
