Well, if it is mid-engined, I think we can forget about a decent trunk. But I personally cannot see them making a front-engine supercar. It is IMO a step backwards from Mid-engined.
SolidCitizen said:I was pretty specific about omitting the heavy, numbing AWD system. That is something that has already been done by Lambo, Porsche, Nissan, etc. How you extrapolate from that to mean omitting all amenities and technology sounds like some issues of your own.
My NSX gets me to work, etc., everyday, and I hope the new one is as comfortable and reliable.
NsSeX said:http://www.auto-g.jp/news/200506/26/newcar01/index.html
And the translated site:
http://translate.google.com/transla...&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=/language_tools
:biggrin: you might just get that!
If honda does indeed decide to go ahead with the SH-AWD, I hope that they convert it to a rwd platform awd system instead of the fwd platform they currently are using in the RL.
SolidCitizen said:So your point is Honda knows what's best.
Animate said:H-carWizKid: Do you have a preference for either RWD or AWD?
H-carWizKid said:I love the current car- I wouldn't be here if I didn't- but to speculate that the next car would be on a technological level with the current 15 year old car adding only a V-10 is silly.
H-carWizKid said:In all honesty- this statement is totally untrue-
H-carWizKid said:Actually- why not just enjoy the car you have and not get yourself all worked up over speculation/theory/conjecture.
SolidCitizen said:Where was "adding only a V-10" said anywhere by anyone?
SolidCitizen said:Everytime an interesting press release comes out, should we all just acknowledge "Honda will do what they think is best" and keep quiet? snore!
SolidCitizen said:How can me thinking the next car will be sweet not be true? So you're saying I definitely won't think the next car will be sweet? hahahaha
SolidCitizen said:Who's speculation/theory/conjecture am I getting worked up over? I'm one of the ones bringing forth speculation/theory/conjecture. AWD vs RWD is a fun debate. The only posts that seem to be getting "worked up" are ones like yours that target all opinions and try to stifle them.
H-carWizKid said:You ain't kiddin. So why address a cry "Honda Don't Do It!"? :biggrin:
ADNOH said:its just logical that they convert it to a rwd platform since the RL was built off an Accord chasis. What I suggest is a system that improves track time/handling w/o the weight of awd. Its SH-RWD. thats right a RWD drivetrain that transfer power between right and left.
NSX PTY said:Has anyone tested the SH-AWD on an RL ?? any comments. For what I've read, it is like taking a curve on train rails... for every person, FUN has a different meaning. If I could take a curve a little faster b/c of the benefits of SH-AWD, it would be more fun to me... instead of hitting a curb
liftcontrol said:heard of the Mitsu EVO. It is arguably one of the most driver oriented and fun cars you can buy irrespective of the price. That it handles at a Supercar level is a known and acknowledged fact.
Dave Hardy said:All things being the same, yes the AWD will be faster. But all things aren't the same. If you've got a 3000# AWD car then that means that you could have had a 2700# RWD car. In that case, I'd rather have the lighter weight RWD.
Who knows with the Japanese- maybe it will be a cube with one wheel, have a control stick for directional control, and a motor that runs on the sunshine coming out of your ass from watching the non-stop "Hello Kitty" cartoons playing on the media pod in the dashboard- we just don't KNOW anything right now do we?
Philip