First of all, what's faulty is the transmission case, not the snap ring. Second of all, I wouldn't hesitate to buy a car in the range of affected transmissions, as long as I were familiar with the symptoms so I could recognize them if and when they occur so that I could park it and get it fixed at that time.Something to watch out for in '91's and '92's is the potential for a faulty transmission counterbalance shaft snap ring. Be sure that the car is not in the faulty snap-ring range or, if it is, that it's been repaired. See the Prime FAQ section for specifics, transmission numbers, #'s, etc. If it is in the faulty range and hasn't been repaired, a failure could cost you around $2k or more in repair bills. Overall, however, the NSX is likely the most reliable of all exotics.
The s2000 feels extremely like a go kart racer...
Black/Ivory is a great color combo. If the car is in very good condition with no deferred maintenance $26K is a very, very fair price. Other than some easily correctable little glitches which you can read about in the FAQ a 91-92 is virtually as good as any other year. It will be older, of course, but that's why it's cheaper. But believe it or not a 91 NSX should be just as reliable as your E46 M3.
My good friend had a heavily modded Civic for years, and then an S2000. He loves it. It's everything he wanted. Until I started to let him drive my NSX. Now he's selling the S2000. :wink:
One word of caution--you'll probably have more fun and run better times at the Autocross with the S2000, if that's what you're into. On a real track the NSX is king. My friend is a big AutoX guy but I think he feels as most do that the NSX is just a better all-around car. And you don't get nearly as much attention in an S2000. :biggrin:
That's the first time I've ever heard that! I would not say that at all. I think I know what you mean...you're using go-kart in the sense in that it feels a little "cheaper" and smaller;
This is definitely not the first time i've heared it, and many others who have owned the s2000 will agree that it feels go-kartish (and thats not saying that its bad in anyway). In terms of refinement, the s2000 is in no way more refined compared to the NSX or even close. My AP1 S2000 was a tight cornering car with a redline to 9000 rpm. Yes, it had rawness which I liked. The interior cabin is quite noisey and definitely not as comfortable as the NSX. You say that you feel that the more go-kartish the car feels the better. Well to me the more formula 1'ish the car feels the better. To each their own I guess. In terms of "cheaper and smaller" is concerned, well...... yes ....it is cheaper and smaller :wink:
Are you trying to suggest that the S2000 is more Formula One than the NSX?
If you've driven an Elise, you would not compare the S2000 to a go-kart...
The Elise is about as raw as it gets and the S2000 feels like a Cadillac compared to an Elise.
Are you trying to suggest that the S2000 is more Formula One than the NSX?
If you've driven an Elise, you would not compare the S2000 to a go-kart...
The Elise is about as raw as it gets and the S2000 feels like a Cadillac compared to an Elise.
I went to check out the 91 NSX today with my parents and they aren't letting me purchase the NSX, they said it's worse than the S2000 and I might die if I get into an accident because it's so low etc etc
It's not like they are paying for the car but they help me with insurance and I can't pay for insurance myself because I'm still going to school and I can't work to pay for the car, insurance, and gas at the same time.
I geuss the NSX will have to wait until after I graduate, but at least I can look for a post 2002 when the time comes :biggrin: . Thanks for everyones help, I definately want to go to NSX meets though.