Nebraska Judge Says 128 mph Not 'Reckless'

Osiris_x11

Gold Member, Moderator: Marketplace
Joined
12 August 2003
Messages
4,971
Location
Austin, Republic of Texas
Nebraska Judge Says 128 mph Not 'Reckless'

Wed Dec 7, 4:35 PM ET

NEBRASKA CITY, Neb. - Speeding is not necessarily reckless, even at 128 mph, a judge ruled in the case of a motorcyclist who tried to flee from state troopers.

With some reluctance, County Judge John Steinheider ruled last week that Jacob H. Carman, 20, was not guilty of reckless driving on Sept. 5, when he was spotted by a trooper who then chased him at the top speed of his cruiser's odometer — 128 mph.

"As much as it pains me to do it, speed and speed alone is not sufficient to establish reckless driving," the judge told Carman on Friday. "If you had had a passenger, there would be no question of conviction. If there had been other cars on the roadway, if you would've went into the wrong lane or anything, I would have convicted you."

Otoe County prosecutor David Partsch acknowledged that Carman could have been charged with speeding but, "We felt that the manner in which he was operating the motorcycle was reckless."

Carman didn't get off entirely. He was fined $300 for expired tags and other violations.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051207/ap_on_re_us/brf__reckless__charge
 
Makes no sense at all, whatsoever...

Perhaps there is more to it?!? :confused:

Otherwise maybe error by prosecution in what charge(s) to pursue in court... :rolleyes:
 
Finally, some degree of common sense. Speed differential, road conditions,& crazy maneuvers play a part too, not just absolute speed.
 
95EagleAWD said:
What a douchebag judge.

Running from the Police alone should be jailtime.

Funny, I didn't read in the original posting that the motorcyclist ran from the police. Just says, "he was spotted by a trooper who then chased him at the top speed of his cruiser's odometer — 128 mph."
 
Back
Top