apapada said:
wow. these are some interesting arguments you have there my friend...
My argument was not about the price alone. It was about paying something
twice what the manufacturer itself thinks its car is worth
Then you really need to price out an original GT40 so you can have a better idea why enthusiast are willing to spend the extra $$ for a reborn legend :wink: .
AND telling its clients not to drive it
due to safety concerns for the car and/or the driver. Last time I checked, the sole real functionality of a car is to be driven...
These cars are made to be driven and driven hard but where are you getting your claims from
I take it in your kiddie book these cars are sitting at some shops or garages sitting collecting dust and their idiotic owners who PAID twice the monroney are loosing sleep at nite (LOL).
Have you actually consulted with GT owners and see what they have to say about the car?
In this case it was the owner's choice, not Acura telling him he cannot drive it. Got the difference ?
YOU are absolutely, positively WRONG!!! Acura would NOT allow him or ANYONE to drive the car PERIOD, Buy first drive later. He was even asked to leave the car at the ACURA dealer for several days for others to view after tha fact that he had already PAID for it. So whats the difference??? NADA!!
Obviously... you are wrong once again. I never asked for a test drive, nor does my local dealership has one on its show floor as far as I know. I do not have time to go to dealerships and free ride vehicles I do not seriously intend to buy.
Good for you :tongue:
Then where did you get the claims about not being able to drive to due to safety reasons etc
I do not know much about the originals, but my understanding has been that they have proved more reliable already than the new ones.
Now I see, glad we got that straight. May I suggest you read about its roots before bashing it :wink: . You are a typical rookie that bashes anything simply because of its manufacturer. Glad you admit " YOU DONT KNOW JACK" about what you are bashing other than the name plate FORD and its faulty seal. You simply follow the "fad" "Ford this", "Chevy that , GM this " yadda, yadda , yadda........
what don't you just admit Ford screwed up once again ? is it that hard for you to recognize you were wrong in you initial comments (see links above) ?
Whats there to admit?? Simply because of a faulty seal does NOT make the car a POS. Heck if you are so concerned about recalls or issues why are you driving a 92 NSX
, If you are such a pefectionist you are obviously in the WRONG YEAR of car. FYI, there were snap rings, window regulators, AC, which YOUR car could very well fall in range, I'd be concerned about YOUR OWN car than cars of others :wink:
You dont think Lambos, Ferraris, Porsches, MB's, BMW's, Jaguars etc.. ever had recalls/ issues and were perfect right out of the box ??
Are you simply paranoid because Ford is selling the GT twice the monroney and True Enthusiast are paying for it?
Bottom line the GT has been in production for nearly a year and many/ most manufacturer will have its flaws the first several years (including our beloved NSX which had its issues the first 2 odd years of production). I am sure you are aware of it. Wheter this car falls short on realiabilty issues or not it will always have the heritage and racing legend. Owning a piece of history is well worth the $$ for the elite enthusiast.
Why dont you buy the GT4 game and admire/drive the legendary beauty on the front cover :biggrin: . You may just like it :biggrin:
Im done with you kiddo :smile: