I have had it with the bias against the "aging" NSX styling and those people and magazines who complain about the NSX's [OK, let's say it together] "12-year old design."
I'm not trying to start a NSX-vs-911 thread here. But as a comparison, if 12 years is an old design, what's Porsche's 40 year old design?? Over the past few months I have read the following adjectives describing the 911's styling:
* timeless
* traditional
* classic
* easily recognizable (my personal favorite; not very exotic then, huh)
OTOH, the NSX is usually referred to as:
* aging
* dated
* old
* unchanged
* "long in the tooth" (my vote for most overused)
When is the 12-year old NSX going to start being referred to as classic? IMO it is as cutting-edge today as in 1991. No one ever talks about how dated a Ferrari Testarossa looks. I love 'em, but one glimse screams '80's. (I can see Crockett getting out now with his pastel T-shirt...)
Why the bias?
I'm not trying to start a NSX-vs-911 thread here. But as a comparison, if 12 years is an old design, what's Porsche's 40 year old design?? Over the past few months I have read the following adjectives describing the 911's styling:
* timeless
* traditional
* classic
* easily recognizable (my personal favorite; not very exotic then, huh)
OTOH, the NSX is usually referred to as:
* aging
* dated
* old
* unchanged
* "long in the tooth" (my vote for most overused)
When is the 12-year old NSX going to start being referred to as classic? IMO it is as cutting-edge today as in 1991. No one ever talks about how dated a Ferrari Testarossa looks. I love 'em, but one glimse screams '80's. (I can see Crockett getting out now with his pastel T-shirt...)
Why the bias?