Vytas said:
Another reason I use Mac is also the beauty of not dealing with constant barrage of security alerts as noted by Neo. I won't go online with my PC laptop and go everywhere with my Mac not having to worry about any virus attacking my computer.
In my opinion, the XP in Windows stands for eXtremely Patched, an OS with lots of bandaids. Just to be fair though, Mac OS X had some patches as well on some vulnerabilities but nothing on the scale of XP which can be very serious.
Mac OS X is like an NSX. It's clean, smooth, polished, refined and very reliable. Not everyone owns it but it's nice to have something that's not a dime a dozen. XP is like a Ford Escort. Everyone has one and it's really nothing special. Mass produced it a has all the problems and is unreliable needing a fix on a weekly basis. Which would you own?
Once I was talking to a new NSX friend of mine and in the short time he got to know me he said, "You must own a Mac!" All NSX owners should own Macs.
This is a strange philosophy though. It's kind of like protection through obscurity. As someone who has been a technology professional for 12 years and has worked fulltime on everything from IBM 3090's to Macs, trust me when I tell you that ANYTHING can fall victim to exploits. All it takes is ONE small hole and you will have a problem since the exploiters have all the time in the world to find it.
The issue with Windows is that since its the dominant platform, it is the number one target of vandals and criminals. Just like a graffiti artist wouldn't bother painting a wall in the middle of nowhere, a virus writer won't waste time on a platform that represents less than 10% of the desktop market.
The thing that's a little scay is that Mac users seem to be in a state of denial thinking that the Mac has some inherant, genetic, resistance to these problems and would never have any need of virus protection, firewalls, spyware scanners, etc.
If the hardcore Mac community ever got its wish and the Mac did become dominant, you'd be in for a rude awakening, I'm afraid. Take a look at the CERT advisory center and just look at all of the FreeBSD advisories there have been recently. Those ALL have the potential to apply to OSX.
Oh, and as a true Windows expert, I haven't ever had an unstable PC system and certainly haven't even had to reboot any of my PCs due to a software failure since Windows 2000. Most Mac users have a lot more experience than their PC counterparts and are more saavy at setting up and running the machine. As a result, PC problems tend to be blown out of proportion while Mac problems are swept under the rug. I've supported as many as 1000 Mac users at once and I saw a big difference in the quality of the user. Mac users are zealots (sorry to say it), and as a result they are obsessively into it and fix a lot of problems themselves. PC users treat the thing like a phone or stapler (which is correct, I think). As a result, if it breaks, they expect someone else to fix it.
Add to this the fact that the PC is a multi-manufacturer, wide open standard from the hardware perspective and you can forgive it for having a slightly tarnished reputation for stability. Personally, I kind of like the freedom of not having a single vendor monopolize the BIOS, system board, part integration, APIs, and OS!