Looks like we have our first real photos

Honda is in a real tough spot. The original style was so right on, that they literally have to destroy the balance of the original design just to be different... No wonder they took 10 years to change it. They could never figure out how to design it better so they bowed to the pressure of the press and change it just for the sake of change.

I think the original design is better than anything I've seen ... it is and always will be a classic... a work of art...an exotic masterpiece.

I'm content with and extremely proud to own the first generation NSX.
 
I might be wrong, but it looks like the new NSX will not come with 17"-18" wheels. The reason I say this is the tire in the picture is a 245/40ZR17. I may mistaken but isn't this the size of the rear tire on the current NSX? Just a thought.
 
Hmm... The more I look at the front, the more it resembles a Mitsubishi 3000GT. Perhaps it is an acquired taste. I'll keep looking at it, and if in a year or two a kit is available, I may have developed a fine appreciation for this new look. Until then, I'll keep on admiring the front of my NSX.
 
I think it looks great, not too drastic of a change, just enough to let you know something is coming! Did anyone eles notice the park distance sensors above where the front turn signals should be?
 
I think I'll reserve final judgement until I see the finished US product, and get used to it. I have been curious to see what Honda was going to do with the NSX, since they claimed that they would never change the shape, because the NSX was the perfect supercar shape. Most of the classic cars of the past were designed by engineers. Then, in the late sixties, designers started to take control of the way cars looked. Fads came and went. The NSX lasted so long without a redesign because it was designed by engineers. This car looks like they let designers work the car over, and the collective overall impression is that of an aftermarket styling exercise.

The air dam extends out as to make the car difficult to get up a driveway. The side skirts add bulk, but should taper in at the door and back out at the wheel wells. This bulk is offset by the wheels, which are more flush with the sidewalls of the tires. Why Honda didn't flair out the fenders to make some room for wider wheels, I can't understand. Seems like it would balance the design, and do something about the flatness of the sides of the car.

The headlights are well designed and good looking, in of themselves, but don't mesh well with the angles of the car. Trying to add curves to an angular shape, the car lacks "Purity of Essence." The headlights needed to be smaller and further forward, they are too big, high, and far back. They do add a point of interest on an otherwise flat plain. I don't think they show enough turn signal to the sides to get through DOT, without having to add more lens on the front bumper or fender fronts.

The rear spoiler is nice, but too aftermarket looking. The hood design seems to echo a theme from the Dual Note prototype at the Tokyo show (see autoweek.com), and won't make it to the standard street car. It should be interesting to see how they handle adding color to the stock seats. What?!! No starter button???

Again, I'll wait to see one in person before making a final judgement. The new Viper (http://www.fantasycars.com/derek/cars/2003rt10.html) seems to suffer from over-design. It doesn't know what it wants to be, SuperMazda, or AmeriZ8. The same is the case here.
 
I'd imagine getting these parts from Acura would be very, very expensive.

What would make more sense is an inexpensive front bumper copy. Maybe even the lights and hood too. I definitely like the bumper, not sure about the rest... and I hate that wing.
 
I think it looks butt-ugly. Blech! I plan on getting an NSX-T in the future, and rest assured, it's going to be a '97-'01 model. That's for sure.

I wouldn't be caught driving this ugly butchered NSX.

Vytas

------------------
"The value of life can be measured by how many times your soul has been deeply stirred." - Soichiro Honda
 
The more I look at these pictures, the more "chopped up" I think it looks. Nothing looks integrated... not the lights, the hood, the spoiler...if fact the car is looking more like every other wanna be and less like an NSX.

Take time to compare it to the original. Like others have said, the front end grabs way to much attention... all the business and it detracts in a major way from the natural lines of the car.

No thank you, I think I'll pass.


------------------
jag 95T
 
Don't worry guys, those pics aren't real either........
wink.gif
sshhhhhhh
 
That looks like 3000GT front stuck on NSX body...ewww! hate that front bumper! The only think I like are the wheels.
 
I think those tires are 215-17, meaning the rears would be 18.

The wheels look a lot like the Axis Sevens I bought.. but I like the Axis better
smile.gif


I think I like the rear lights.

[This message has been edited by nsx808 (edited 19 October 2001).]
 
Originally posted by MAJOR STONER:
The new Viper (http://www.fantasycars.com/derek/cars/2003rt10.html) seems to suffer from over-design. It doesn't know what it wants to be, SuperMazda, or AmeriZ8. The same is the case here.

I think the new RT/10 looks like an inflated S2000.

2002_dodge_viper_rt10-6.jpg
 
I was at Virginia International Raceway last Saturday to visit some friends at a Car Guys track weekend. One of the VIR security guys told me Honda was there last month for some track time with an NSX "sort of like yours (a '96) except it was all yellow including the interior." He thought he remembered yellow wheels too. Maybe Honda is actually working on a new 2002 model!

On the downside, he said the car was in the country on a manufacturer's prototype registration and they were going to have to crush after they were done testing it
frown.gif
 
Back
Top