I assume this "rant" was directed at my earlier post, which obviously you took out of context. Not once did I ever say nor allude to [paraphrased]
"the LFA is only (an over-priced) Toyota, it's not worth that much..." or
"Toyota/Lexus are making / not making this-that much unless they sell this-that amount..." blah-bla-bha. . .
I believe you (and others) have misinterpreted my curiosity of whether or not
Toyota/Lexus was going to use the
LF-A technology, R&D, and know-how
directly towards other emerging vehicles in their portfolio, and in doing so - some of the development/production costs can be offset/subsidized.
{not directed at anyone in particular...} It's extremely myopic to think that a global automotive giant steeped deep in Japanese tradition/philosophy who is (at the moment) losing billions of dollars, making no profit, losing market-share in key areas/segments, closing-down factories/plants, and laying-off thousands of workers has no financial care nor concern in terms of releasing a halo/hallmark offering for just the sake of
Prius-owner prestige.
Although, they may have well truly done that w/ such in mind (pride/bragging), I am just wondering what the big-picture was for
Toyota/Lexus in creating/marketing this offering & if it'll pave the way for other neat stuff (hand-assembled ~$125k exotic sports-car w/ extensive use of composites, mass-produced ~$50k sports-car w/ prodigious power & partial composite-construction, variants of the V10 in long-wheelbase exec'-spec
LS or
LX/Landcruiser or even something for their heavy-duty Tundra light-truck line). . .
Anything/everything is worth what it is as long as there are those out there who are willing to acquire it. . .
Case-&-point, the similarly offered ~$1million+
Aston Martin 77 &
Lamborghini Reventon...