I agree with this. My personal view is that hp is getting excessive and dangerous and the hp side of it never was that important to Honda or important to me. Fukui's statements about a V-10 just reinforce how out of touch he is with Soichiro's philosophy.
Hp is very important but only in the sense that it contributes to overall performance. True, the NSX was never the fastest car in the world but it was faster than the benchmark car at the time--the F348. And the NA2 NSX was arguably equal to the F355. IMO that is a crucial point. The NSX replacement must be competitive with the benchmark. If it's MR, that would be the F430. If it's FE it appears that will be the GT-R or the 599 GTB. Not necessarily faster than these cars, but certainly within spitting distance. If it can accomplish that with 200 hp I'd be happy.
A V-10 isn't the answer but a V-8 might be. Why Honda fails to build this engine just baffles me to no end. Everyone else has one--clearly it's not a fad. A Honda 4.0L V-8 could easily produce 450 hp--plenty to compete with the GT-R or F430. With Honda's resources they could really maximize that power. And it would have less hp that every other car in its class. And in the case of the 599 GTB over 150 hp less!
So hp is important but not the main issue. One of the biggest complaints about the HSC was that the proposed engine could possibly be a 3.5L V-6 with less than 350 hp. I think we all agree that there was room to go up without compromising Honda's philosophy. And many, many here have suggested that it was a huge mistake on Honda's part not to offer the CTSC as a factory option. That would have given the NA2 NSX well over 350 hp. Clearly by the time of the HSC's introduction even more was needed just to be competitive.
A lot of weight is given to things like reliability, comfort and ease of use--all of which the NSX has. But performance is equally important. Not just power or straight line speed. It really does matter how fast you can get around the track. You don't have to be the fastest and you don't have to sacrifice feeling like a hero to get it (like one does in the Z06 where only a master can pilot it to the top of the time sheets) but you do have to be in the ballpark. Honda can surely design a car that can put up comparable 'ring times and still provide feedback, limit mistakes and makes you feel like a hero.
I agree 100% It wasn't cause Honda/Acura had one of the fastest cars that lured me to it, It was the fact that they showed that when you balance everything out, you don't need tons of hp to compete. Now I will probably never be able to afford the next Gen NSX, but I will be able to (eventually) pick up my own NA1, if I play my cards right maybe a NA2.