People keep on talking about the NSX demographics changing due to cars getting cheaper.. causing younger immature buyers....Ricers...... Whatever..
Lets see if its true. Whether or not the cost to acquire has dropped?
This poll serves to analyze if it is indeed now cheaper to "acquire" / less cash on hand needed.
It is well believed to be more difficult to acquire/purchase a over 10 year old car than a 2002 due to lack of financing on the older cars.
Lets not go into motives for financing vs cash or pros and negatives of what else you could do with the money, investments and so on...
As cars get older you need more cash to acquire even though the total price is less... affording a 30k new STI and a 1991 30K NSX requires two entirely different financial situations. Therefore meaning the NSX will not turn into a ricers toy just because their 30k. It's easier to finance a new Z06 than finance a $30k 15 year old NSX and paying $30K cash even harder. Thats what makes them still a dream car for most, even 30K though does not seem like allot of money.
Lets see if its true. Whether or not the cost to acquire has dropped?
This poll serves to analyze if it is indeed now cheaper to "acquire" / less cash on hand needed.
It is well believed to be more difficult to acquire/purchase a over 10 year old car than a 2002 due to lack of financing on the older cars.
Lets not go into motives for financing vs cash or pros and negatives of what else you could do with the money, investments and so on...
As cars get older you need more cash to acquire even though the total price is less... affording a 30k new STI and a 1991 30K NSX requires two entirely different financial situations. Therefore meaning the NSX will not turn into a ricers toy just because their 30k. It's easier to finance a new Z06 than finance a $30k 15 year old NSX and paying $30K cash even harder. Thats what makes them still a dream car for most, even 30K though does not seem like allot of money.
Last edited: