- Joined
- 24 May 2002
- Messages
- 1,431
It sounds like the dealer got you to commite a crime so that their crime would be less likely to come back at them. You need a lawyer.
It sounds like the dealer got you to commite a crime so that their crime would be less likely to come back at them. You need a lawyer.
Brian2by2 said:Ok, so far, it does say on a "bill of sale" that was typed by the dealer that it was sold "As-Is; salvage history" But RIGHT after that it has a whole bunch of mumbo jumbo about car histories and all that (irrelevant to my car).
.
Brian2by2 said:what do u mean by that Tony?
Talk to the attorney, that's a good first step. With that said, I would be leary of any attorney who reccomended suit before trying to come to an agreement on your own with the other party, the dealer in this case. As I said before. gather all the documents and facts. Who said what, where an afidavit can be obtained should be included. Discuss the "case" with council, and decide how it is best for you to proceed. Myself, I always try to do as much of the legal work as I can (small personal matters which this would fall into). What I mean by that is I have council, and we discuss everything and use their advice, but my first move to the other party is on my own...with the facts laid out, as well as what the next steps will be should a settlement not be reached. Second step might be simply to use the attorney's leterhead. I usually prepare a draft of what is to be sent out, allowing concil to edit. And so on down the line.Brian2by2 said:...i've decided... i am going to pursue legal actions and sue for teh difference... . An attorney may have a different idea...won't know till tomorrow.
Brian2by2 said:it does say on a "bill of sale" that was typed by the dealer that it was sold "As-Is; salvage history"
RSO 34 said:You were placed on notice of the salvage history by your own admission that it was on the bill of sale. The fact that there was no sticker may lead to a violation against the dealer but probably would not be considered a fraudulent inducing act considering that your bill of sale clearly advised you that the car had a history. Whether you knew what that history was would still be your own fault in not following up on the statement on that bill of sale.
Your complicity in the tax fraud also doesn't help your credibility with respect to your argument that the lack of a sticker caused you to purchase the vehicle because you believed it "was clean."
Take the insurance money, fix the car and post the VIN here in the event this car ends up on the market at some point in the future.
Bob
Brian2by2 said:Yes, I was aware that the car had a salvage history, however, i have 2 witnesses (one of which is not associated with me but rather just a guy i paid to look at teh car) that both remember him saying that the salvage title was only because of a few body parts being replaced.
Brian2by2 said:The carfax he gave me had to have been doctored though because i would not have missed that. I am young and naive, but not completely ignorant.
RyRy210 said:A few body parts being replaced doesn't sound like something that would warrant a Salvage Title.
Here is a brief definition I found:
A salvage vehicle is any title bearing vehicle that has been declared a total loss from Fire, Vandalism, Collision, Theft or Flood.
The carfax he gave me had to have been doctored though because i would not have missed that. I am young and naive, but not completely ignorant.