WingZ said:Yeah I saw that thread and all it really does is reinforce the schizophrenia of this community ,plus show Honda why they shouldn't make another NSX for us. I actually believe I got a bargain when I bought my NSX new as used NSX's are just to expensive to me ( more than $20k for a used car just hurts to think about ) of course to each his own.
We keep comparing the first NSXs particulars to the Ferrari 348 ,but Honda didn't make the NSX as a 348 competitor. I mean the 348 came out one year before the NSX if Honda was using a Ferrari as a target it would've targeted the 328 GTS which it clearly didn't. So that comparison doesn't hold water to me. We lose sight when we want the next NSX to be a Ferrari competitor when the first NSX wasn't and what I mean by that is Honda made the best exotic they could not just a Japanese Ferrari knockoff people who view it as such just didin't get it. From what I can see Honda clearly was using the NSX as it's own yardstick. Ferrari and Porsche needed to make better cars because of the NSX not vice versa. Did they catch up "hell ya" ,but look at how much that catch up costs! If I was baller rich I wouldn't be comparing an NSX to Ferrari I would just buy what I want ( hey do you rich guys comparison shop? :biggrin: ) ,but since I'm not the only new affordable( to me ) mid engine exotic was the NSX.
Oh man if Honda was using the NSX as the yardstick for the HSC what a great car that would've been...drool. Sadly most people just want a poor mans Ferrari instead of Hondas best....tsk tsk tsk how sad:frown:
Ferrari will never be truly "competitive" with any Honda product. This has been discussed before. We've shown how even though Ferrari puts out a clearly inferior, overpriced product it will still sell regardless of what anyone else, including Honda, does.
No doubt Honda was building the best car they could for Honda. But the nature of the sports car world is relative performance and value. Right now the F430 goes around the track faster than any other ME car in its class. That's important because it becomes the yardstick by which everyone uses whether they're conscious of it or not.
Both Honda and Ferrari participate in Formula One to an equal degree and therefore it's conceivable that their philosophy and products are going to be similar.
I think you're ignoring the nature of the sports car world which is inherently comparison based. I don't believe that Honda is trying to "beat" the F430 but they must certainly be analyzing it. Why is the ZO6 so great? Relative performance and pricing. I believe GM built the ZO6 for GM but they knew where they stood.