I don't know about consensus, but my advice would be not to fix it until it breaks OR you need transmission service ANYWAY (e.g. clutch replacement), and to fix it at that time.Sockeye said:I think the consensus is if its not broke don't fix it.
nsxtasy said:I don't know about consensus, but my advice would be not to fix it until it breaks OR you need transmission service ANYWAY (e.g. clutch replacement), and to fix it at that time.
We just did snap ring repair on a 92 with 76k miles. The owner felt the same way before it failed.larrynsx said:I bought my 92 NSX last week and the sales already told me that my car is the snap-ring range. However, she told me that the snap-ring problem should occur at the very early stage. Right now my car has 43k miles on it and what she said was if nothing had happened, the chance of the failure with this mileage is very minimum. Was that true?
larrynsx said:I bought my 92 NSX last week and the sales already told me that my car is the snap-ring range. However, she told me that the snap-ring problem should occur at the very early stage. Right now my car has 43k miles on it and what she said was if nothing had happened, the chance of the failure with this mileage is very minimum. Was that true?
No.gobble said:Does Acura help out at all any more with this repair?
nsxtasy said:
My car isn't in the snap ring range, so it's second hand by definition. Then again, they don't necessarily treat everyone the same, either.gobble said:Do you know the first or second hand?