Yup. Hockeygoalie conveniently overlooks the fact that the 996 is regarded as one of the most hated designs to porsche enthusiasts. His numbers also don't really support his argument at all. If supply is the key determinant factor, then that would suggest that the first-gen NSX will hold its value just fine.
The post above proves my point exactly.......I think the confusion here is that people are not understanding the meaning of Supply and Demand. Supply is NOT the key determining factor, the relationship between Supply and Demand is. Yes, I am an Economics Major.
Two basic assumptions:
1) When Supply exceeds Demand: Prices Drop
2) When Demand exceeds Supply: Prices Rise
In the quote above, the poster states "the 996 is regarded as one of the most hated (I agree) designs to porsche enthusiasts (I am a porsche enthusiasts, I own 2)"
What he's really saying in Economic terms is that DEMAND of the 996 is LOW. We all agree per my previous post that 996 production numbers were HIGH, Translation: SUPPLY of the 996 is high.
See #1 above, when SUPPLY exceeds DEMAND (as the 996 does) prices drop.
Another posted stated the 993 is desirable because it was the last of the air cooled 911's. (I couldn't agree more). What he's really saying is the DEMAND for the 993 is high. We've established that SUPPLY of 993's are low. See number 2 above:
When DEMAND exceeds SUPPLY (as the 993 does) prices rise
Based on this assumption a 993 will be worth more than a 996.
Another posted stated he felt the R34 GTR will be worth more than the new GTR. I agree 100%. Assuming demand for both are the same, the SUPPLY of R34's are less than the new GTR. Therefore the R34 will eventually be worth more. Which is faster has nothing to do with which will be worth more.
A 1960 Ferrari 250 is worth much more then a new Ferrari 458. Why? The 1960 Ferrari 250 is 0-60 in 8 seconds but is worth millions more than a 0-60 in 3 seconds Ferrari 458. Why? Because there is a smaller SUPPLY of 1960 Ferrari 250's.
Think of it like the housing market. A few years ago when everyone could qualify for a mortgage, and unemployment was low, DEMAND for housing exceeded the SUPPLY of houses on the market, so therefore the price of a houses went way up.
Today, when people have lost their jobs and it is harder to qualify for a mortgage, housing DEMAND is very low and the inventory (SUPPLY) of houses for sale is very high, this has caused housing prices to decrease sharply.
The new NSX due to the high price point will probably only sell 100 or 200 (that's just a wild guess of US annual sales) for 5 years. Let's assume a total production of 1,000 cars for the upcoming NSX.
There are 9,849 1991-2005 NSX's built. Assuming Demand is the same, the new NSX will be worth more because the SUPPLY is less.
Now, if there is a change to the Demand this would change the outcome. For example, lets assume every new NSX has an engine failure, 100% of them. The DEMAND for the new NSX would be low and this would off set the low SUPPLY and therefor the first gen NSX would be worth more.
We're just having fun here. No one can predict the future. I'm not trying to offend anyone.
I'm buying an NSX to enjoy because they are fun to drive, I love mid engine cars. I'm not buying it for investment potential. If that was the case, I would buy a 2005 with 10 miles on it and lock it away in a climate controlled storage bubble.
If u modify your car, your investment potential is out the window anyway so enjoy your wonderful car and don't worry about saving it for the next owner.
I will be buying one shortly.