Tire Rack is the BEST source of information when trying to "Properly Size Your Tires". Judging by your comments, I don't think you have a handle on what is said in the article in
Post #1 3
I know nsxtasy didn't read the article, but some important cliff notes:
-UTQG is USELESS
-Treadwear ratings are USELESS
-Tire "A" in a 255 can be WIDER than Tire "B" in a 275. You have to look at Section & Tread Widths of a tire, NOT the stated 'mm' widths. Only Tire Rack measures this.
It really depends on what year NSX and what programming differences (if any) they did to the ABS/TC.
91-93
205/50-15 = 23.1"
225/50-16 = 24.9" = Rear
7.9% larger
94-01
215/45-16 =
23.6"
245/40-17 = 24.7" = Rear
4.6% larger
02-05
215/40-17 =
23.8"
255/40-17 = 25" = Rear 5.4% larger
Without knowing more on the ABS/TC programming, I feel if you keep the front to rear diameters within 4.6% to 7.9%, you'll be okay.
Having said that, a common track setup is:
235/40-17 =
24.4"
275/35-18 = 25.6" = Rear
4.9% larger
The 235/40-17 has a 0.8" larger outer diameter than the largest factory tire size, 0.4" larger radius and will rub the fender liners, but with a more track-oriented/aggressive front camber, this is reduced. Removing the fender liners makes this setup streetable at the expense of no liners.
225/35-18 =
24.2"
265/30-19 = 25.3" =
4.6% Larger
A 225/35-18 =
24.2"
275/30-19 = 25.5" = Rear
5.4% Larger
*The 225/35-18 is 0.4" larger in diameter and will raise the car less than 1/4" over the stock 215/40-17 while being 0.2" smaller in diameter than the commonly used 235/40-17. The 265/30-19 seems like a great choice to keep the OD down at 25.3" which is less than half an inch (and
1.6% larger) than the 91-93 NSX's 24.9" OD rear tire. The 275/30-19 is a little larger but I still don't think it will be significant or a concern from a gear ratio standpoint.
So my recommendation given your "want it all" needs of performance, ride, comfort, and longevity is a PSS in the 225/35-18 and either 265 (or 275)/30-19 rear, depending on the width of your wheels.
Take this with a grain of salt because it's a autoX/test track, but the Michelin's 1-2 results in the wet/dry skidpad and wet/dry lap times backs up my personal experiences with the PSS vs all the tires listed here (which i've driven on except the S04).
http://www.caranddriver.com/compari...mmer-performance-tires-tested-comparison-test
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/monsters-of-grip-nine-summer-performance-tires-tested.pdf
The PSS is a competitve to the AD08/RS3 in lighter cars like the NSX. The RS3/SS/AD08s with their large tread blocks really shine on heavy cars that are under-tired:
http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/wheels-tires/1401-the-best-200-treadwear-tires-test/
If you're tracking a heavy M3 with narrow tires, an RS3/SS/08 will be faster than a PSS, but on a lighter Porsche or NSX, I don't think you'll see as big of a difference. If you're trying to break track records, I probably wouldn't go with the PSS, but if you can't get 100% out of your car from a driving standpoint, and if you don't feel like you'll use the car more than 25% of the time on track, and rain performance and ride quality is remotely important to you, go with the PSS.
The PSS is one of my all time favorite tires and is also a LIGHT tire, which further improves ride quality and performance.