liftshard said:Put it this way, the B2 came out in 1989 and people still go, "oh, dizzamn" when one does an overfly.
WTF
liftshard said:Put it this way, the B2 came out in 1989 and people still go, "oh, dizzamn" when one does an overfly.
vtec888 said:tell them it's a 2010 model...they wouldn't know.
It's true that most people do not know what it is....................
zahntech said:I also saw your other thread and if your worried about depreciation and cost of ownership then you better go buy an Accord or a Camry, as for the 96 NSX it has already lost most of the value its going to and as far as buying a 10 year old car? so what its a Honda. It shares a lot of parts and technology with the Acura Legend/RL and I would buy a 96 RL in a heartbeat if I was looking for that kind of car.
I was in your shoes back in 2001 .. same quote .. except that I had to add " with 91000 miles, sight unseen from 2000 miles away from a guy I didn't know, in another country, who raced it on weekends". Now that will make you blush .. and will have your friends checking your mental health! Best damn thing I ever did.PassingBy said:I mean, if I was to tell people I just bought a car for $xx,xxx that was 10 years old I would blush!
PassingBy said:wow, great replies. It seems some people are attacking me for my question, I don't mean to 'insult' you guys in any way if that is how some of you have taken it (maybe I struck your ego's??? hehe)
I love the car, I am just not a rich person (yet! j/k).
I have enough to buy the car outright, but I've been told that buying a originally high priced car that is 'old' is not a good idea...especially someone like me who can't really repair the car myself (unlike others who can do some small repair work themselves).
I'm 27, and i've been told the insurance is very high on this car....something I'm going to research soon.
If the issue was, buy the car for around $40K, maybe spend $2K a year on operating costs (tires, small repair work here and there) I would be more comfortable with the decision. I guess it comes down to buying a car that was well maintained.
Let me search for some 'horror' stories of people buying abused cars so I know what my potential loss can be hahaha (as you can tell i'm overly paranoid!!!)
I've driven in 2 nsx's, it has been my fav. car for years but i've never been in a position to think about getting one. The thought of having one is a dream really, but it is somethign that can be realized if I ever get the guts.
Whoever told you that is wrong. Heck, I pay more to insure my Integra than to insure my NSX.PassingBy said:I'm 27, and i've been told the insurance is very high on this car....something I'm going to research soon.
PassingBy said:Hi,
I would love to get a NSX, and if I ever do it seems I would be getting one that is pre '96/97.
If a car is around 10 years old, but has low miles....is it really considered an 'old' car? I mean, if I was to tell people I just bought a car for $xx,xxx that was 10 years old I would blush! hahaha
thoughts? (just want to get this thought past me hehe)
no kidding. buy what you want. eff other people.wctsao said:Yes, its an "old" car regardless of mileage. If you don't want to blush, quit telling everyone how much you paid and that it was 10 years old.
Those are my thoughts.