Dave, this is one of your most reasoned post on this issue; you have finally seen the balance
All I've done is ask questions and present information that I have found after lots of research. I am not sure what is "unbalanced" in anything I said in the past. Point it out if you feel something isn't right please.
even though you still show some bias re the impact of what you are doing to the A pillar in an NSX-T.
The A and B are connected. If you strengthen one, you add some amount of strength to the other. That is all I have said. How much more is up for debate and it depends fully on the type of impact. What part of that is "biased"?
I am not sure why you feel I would in the smallest way be biased. We are talking about real important stuff that can affect someone's life or limb. I am sure that you would not want me hurt.... and I sure wouldn't want you to be hurt... biases and the desire to "be right" don't belong in these discussions. I am always open to hear what you or anyone else has to say.
but have you seen or come across anyone/picture where harness bolts ripped off during an incident
No, I haven't... but how is that proof that they won't? How many NSX's have you seen with harness bars in serious accidents? Can you think of one? I haven't seen any.
Ask a local cage builder what he thinks Hrant, you may be surprised of what kind of answer you get. I have a guy localy that has been building cages for 20 years look at my car. I showed him the harness bar attachment points. He took a long hard look at the car inside, underneath, took out some sort of device I did not even recognize, took measurements and said he did not feel that was a good idea. I trust this guy a WHOLE LOT more than our guesswork.
Perhaps it is fine for certain impacts. We don't really know. We don't know the type of accident that one may have, nor the forces exerted on the bar. But we do know one thing.... attachment to the frame rails and strut towers is DEFINITELY stronger.