Blaze said:
I'd like to here some info on this as well from the people who are using it.
What systems do NSX owners use and why.
Bats:
Please don't take what I have to say as 100% fact. I have limited experience with NOS, but I'll share what I know and have heard.
DRY
Dry systems are just that. Dry. They rely on foggers or series of foggers to distribute giggle gas into the intake system. You "can" consider them safer and simpler since they don't require additional fuel that could pre-detonate or additional lines that could leak or clutter the engine bay.
WET
Wet system combine both NOS and Fuel. Adding additional fuel can prevent lean conditions and reduce EGTs. Most often wet systems are used for higher volume NOS applications.
Something else you touched on was a single fogger system. IMHO, this would seem to be a bad idea on the NSX. Basically you have one fogger, deploying gas in somewhere before the TB. The gas then needs to distribute itself evenly into each intake runner. Typically the first intake runners will see more NOS then the ones further away. This could cause several adverse things to occur. Without getting into each, I would recomend a direct port Nitrous system*. This means six foggers (one on each runner). This will insure equal distribution to all cylinders.
So again, I'm not an expert on this. I'd certainly value some insite from people who are.
Blaze
*Direct port injection while ideal, is more expensive and more cumbersome to maintain and install.
Gentlemen, please use are very good search function as the basic systems have been discussed in great detail. dry,wet direct port are all their and broken down into further systems on the componant level.
We have also addressed each systems pro's and con's in great detail as well as safety features which I cannot srtess enough,how to set them up and what they do as well of some you may not have heard about such as clutch safety switch,oil temp safety switch and some others.These are in addtion to your WOT SWITCH,FPSS and window switch.
Blaze,I agree with you that direct port is the safest of the three only because you can fine tune the delivery of n20 and supplemental fuel on a per cylinder basis making for an even A/F RATIO across the board.
As stated you can pull up more articles then you could read in a day on the three main setups also helpful info on tuning the system you desire and why we like one more then another.we have folks here that use all of them.
Finally the prep of the car pre install is discussed at great length such as having your injectors C&C'ed by RC, replacing your fuel filter and using proper n20 plugs and having your fuel pump tested for integrity are a few. so use that search function guys. I have used all three for testing purposes and had zero problems and I was the installer on them all. good luck do some research and decide if N20 is for you,you may decide on a SC or Turbo after your research but if you do go with spray dont go cheap on the install and car prep as that IMHO is what makes for a bad day for some,I guess that would go for all the FI choices you have.get the best you can afford as long as you are not getting bent over on prices (research them)
Best Regards David
PS. Blaze, the foggers are better then ever these days(the fuel and n20 is atomized well) and not as tight as direct port they are quite good. heck they use them to spool up large turbos quicker and get a jump with massive low rpm torque on the SC. seems lots of mix and match going on these days and I like it! BTW with the costly AEM ,yes I am buying them anyway... you can run a dry direct port setup, no I am not going into detail right now,it does not list this as a feature but it is their,big injectors that idle well and the abilty to kick n20 with the AEM with its own n20 fuel map ready to go.as long as you have calibrated injectors and with this you dont need to run them at max duty cycle you now have the safest wet or dry system 2500 plus n20 parts money can buy!
