Ahh... so true. When I first started looking for my NSX 10 years ago, I debated whether I should wait for that "new NSX". Good thing I bought one back then because otherwise I'd still be waiting for it to come out...
-- Joe
Autoweek: Lexus' LF-A Spied - NSX? What NSX?
- Thread starter needspeed
- Start date
Ahh... so true. When I first started looking for my NSX 10 years ago, I debated whether I should wait for that "new NSX". Good thing I bought one back then because otherwise I'd still be waiting for it to come out...
-- Joe
Huh? It is the test mule.
I hate when people misread/misquote information. that car around the 'ring is a TEST MULE, you might want to look up the meaning of it.
And that's what I said... but THEY said it's the NEW NSX! They are not aware that's the test mule for the new motor...
I would have to disagree in part with your statement here. You do have a legitimate point regarding the dealership service issue. Although I have been treated with nothing by kindness from my local dealer, the level of 'customer service' itself is not up to par versus, say, BMW or MB. This is a definite short-coming.
However, look at the price tag of the NSX during its introduction of $80k+. This price was back in 1991. Time value of money should play a small role in this figure, and to re-introduce the car at a similar (and yes, $100k is relatively similar) price point should produce steady sales. The 2007 consumer will pay the extra money. People pay $250+ for a pair of jeans these days. It's all about branding. The American consumer knows Honda makes an outstanding product. We, as NSX owners, are a bit more discerning(sp) and we seek a higher caliber automobile for performance reasons. If Honda posted the numbers, you mean to tell me you wouldn't be willing to purchase it (especially with the reliability that Honda offers...second to none I would argue)?
I think we put too much emotion into this topic sometimes. Think about it from a logical stand point. Unless anyone here on the forum has built a bigger brand than 'Honda' I'm not sure how we can be so quick to judge. BTW, I was speaking to my NSX tech here, and met with some Honda/Acura service exec's and the things he saw from them were very encouraging. Give them time, you have a great car to drive until then. My only hope is that with the new model, they don't let it remain stagnant like they did in the first 14 years.
Tony (Autovation), I think you may be on to something. Great points. It will be interesting to see what they can do with fuel economy/alternative fuel source compatibility. We all know this is undoubtly the future of the automobile.
Okay, I'm done. Off to "warm up the tires" on my 1994 NSX that still turns heads at every stop light!!!
The NSX was actually in the low-$60k range when it was introduced, not $80k+. The price increased steadily and quickly year after year, topping out at just shy of $90k in '97 or so.
My apologies. What year was it then, when the sticker price reached $80k+? I own a 94, and I recall finding a quote somewhere in that range. Either way, a $60k+ Honda (consumers know Acura's true owner) in 91 was unheard of. The point I was trying to make, while not entirely correct in the historical data, is that the price was not even close to any other automobile in the line. I just don't agree with the argument that consumers won't pay a considerable amount more for an exotic Honda/Acura. They did (in 91) and still do (resale values of a 05 versus Honda/Acura's other vehicles). We just all need to hope that Honda sets the benchmark high...again.
I think you are correct, my friend. Let us know what you decide. It should be an amazing car, to say the least. Cheers!
