Well, I obviously disagree with the above. I like fast cars. Period. I want the car to be fast no matter what the transmission is.
I don't make excuses for autos and say "well, I should buy a manual if I want it to be fast". I've had and been in too many fast, fast automatics for that nonsense.
Of course this is all a personal thing, but I dont think theres anything wrong at all with someone with an auto wanting it to get to 60 quicker than 6 seconds
There's "serious about racing" and then theres just "I want a sportscar thats quicker than a sedan".
The auto is starting out really, really, really slow compared to any other quick car on the road today. My BMW 330XI was very close in acceleration to my 03 NSX. ANYTHING with an AMG badge will decimate it. Not good.
My Vette, on the other hand, was rocketing through the 1/4 mile in the low 12's with an auto (torque converter, headers, exhaust, power loader, cold air induction, 3.42 rear diff) I test drove a 911TT tip that was a rocketship and felt easily as quick as my Vette bone stock.
If I could get the NSX auto at least down into the 13's, I think I'd be happy.
I know the NSX isnt a drag racing car, but drag racing performance, in the end, equates to on ramp and highway merge performance. Having nice, linear, power and acceleration available on the highway is something that ANYONE who pays $88k for a sportscar wants to enjoy... Auto or not...
Look at it this way... One of the hottest topics here on the Prime is how underpowered the NSX is in general. Well, with the auto, its about 30% WORSE of a problem. The auto still is produced and still carries the NSX look. If Honda is going to continue with an auto option on the HSC (sequential or traditional auto), they'd better make sure it can actually deliver. Doing what they've been doing (and what Mazda did with the RX8) and saying "real performance enthusiasts dont want an auto" just delivers marketshare to BMW, Mercedes and Porsche on a silver platter.