- Joined
- 7 January 2013
- Messages
- 361
I ordered a nozzle kit from a company and they sent me the water/meth aem failsafe system. I mentioned it, and they said since it took a few weeks to even ship it out, our lost is your gain. So I'm still down a nozzle which I reordered from another company, but now I have this failsafe. For those that have seen my older posts, my goal was to reach 400whp on a 3.0 with a whipple. I am currently running the high boost pulley, just finished installing my ID1000s and my AEM EMS. I do have the aem water/meth kit, but now I have this in addition, I'm debating about setting up 2 maps. I originally got the water/meth kit for cooling (water) only as it had less risks and kept the IATs under control. Now, I'm debating about having a second map, one with some more aggressive timing adjustments to account for a 50/50 mixture. Does the failsafe system give that much more peace of mind? I have gone way overboard on monitoring. I monitor everything you could possibly think of, dual wide bands, dual EGTs, and everything in between.
I do not really have a heavy foot, and there is no track here in Hawaii. So long extended pulls are pretty much non existent. What is the best way to use this system to my advantage? And what wire on the AEM EMS harness do I tap into, for it to swap two different maps? I'm open to any advice for or against. I understand this is not a direct injection system, but I felt as if the EGTs would monitor the piston temps as the timing was altered.
I do not really have a heavy foot, and there is no track here in Hawaii. So long extended pulls are pretty much non existent. What is the best way to use this system to my advantage? And what wire on the AEM EMS harness do I tap into, for it to swap two different maps? I'm open to any advice for or against. I understand this is not a direct injection system, but I felt as if the EGTs would monitor the piston temps as the timing was altered.