How do these compare to the NSX? They probably don't huh? you know my driving style, crazy mountain runner .
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/cto/1634695860.html
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/cto/1634695860.html
How do these compare to the NSX? They probably don't huh? you know my driving style, crazy mountain runner .
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/cto/1634695860.html
Fun car and CHEAP to modify. Lots of low end torque, but hope you dont mind a very plasticy interior.
s2000 > 350Z anyday mang....
I've had 2 changes to get into a 350Z roadster each time I sold my s2000 but kept going back to the s2000 :biggrin: (on my 4th one now)
I would agree with Rick, if I had a bigger garage, a S2000 would be in my garage.
The ~$10k'ish price-realm has some interesting choices in terms of RWD 2-seat late-model sports-coupes...
- Niissan 350z
- Honda S2000 (AP1)
- Porsche Boxster (986)
- BMW M3 (E36)
but the Honda s2000 really has no comparison except maybe to a Lotus Elise. Even the NSX is a different breed that cannot be compared to the s2000 driving experience.
The s2000 is a cult car
rick
Sorry, but have to disagree..
Try a Miata, or even better, a turbo kitted Miata, it is a way more nimble and lightfooted car than the S2000.
Yes, build quality on the S2000 is better, but as far as driving fun is concerned, my Turboed Miata is much nicer.
I once made a long testdrive in a demo S2000 and was impressed by it's chassis, roadholding and build quality.
I however really disliked it's vtech power, or better: the lack of it under 6.5K revs, having to keep pushing it to get any performance.:frown:
When after the testdrive returning home in my Turbo Miata (with about 210 bhp) it felt soo much more nimble, more fun and with power coming on full blast at about 3K revs, so much nicer to drive...
Yes, it feels a lot more flimsy and less solid, but still, Miata's are bullitproof build quality.
No S2000 for me, thanks.
Because of the S2000 engine caracter, it almost turned me off getting my NSX as I was expecting the same lack of power in low revs on the NSX. Luckily a testdrive in a NSX proved otherwise, it having acceptable low rev power because of the 6-cil.
After owning my NSX for 2 years, I could however no longer resist.............and got me a CTSC to get the the extra low revs power that I was still missing....:biggrin::wink:
my view of the Miata has always been a 6'4 tall, bald headed middle-aged guy trying to squeeze into the car. Sorry if you fits that description but it's just how I perceive that car.
rick
Don't ignorantly mistake silence for validation. The thread is regarding relatively new entrants into the sub-$10k realm, a place the MX5-Miata has already been for a long time (most 1st gen's are $2.5k-$5k).Notice how no one else here mentioned the Miata? It's not a highly desirable car...
It's because you seemingly have a superficial/generalizing poseur mentality who wears or decorates cars like Bedazzled-attire or cupcakes, not drives/competes the vehicles. But, that's just how I perceive that type of owner.s4play said:~ my view of the Miata has always been a 6'4 tall, bald headed middle-aged guy trying to squeeze into the car. Sorry if you fits that description but it's just how I perceive that car.
Presume in a few years the GTO will be nearing $10K which would be fun I'm sure Batman would agree with this
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2004...ewItemQQptZUS_Cars_Trucks?hash=item2c538d1c82
Don't ignorantly mistake silence for validation. The thread is regarding relatively new entrants into the sub-$10k realm, a place the MX5-Miata has already been for a long time (most 1st gen's are $2.5k-$5k).
It's because you seemingly have a superficial/generalizing poseur mentality who wears or decorates cars like Bedazzled-attire or cupcakes, not drives/competes the vehicles. But, that's just how I perceive that type of owner.
Individuals w/ an actual performance mentality & interest towards road-courses, tracks, et'al speak highly of the MX5-Miata platform w/ remarkable handling/balance/lightweight/prowess-&-potential... and many of them owning one themselves for its merits, not image portrayed.
In'fact, there are (3) NSX'ers who are automotive performance enthusiasts / "gearheads", within a short drive of me, all three are into HPDE, track-events, road-courses, etc'; their stable:
(A): NA2 NSX CTSC, FD RX7, Buell XB, MX5-Miata
(B): NA2 NSX, 997 911 GT3, MX5-Miata
(C): NA1 NSX, (sold) Ducati 998, MX5-Miata, MX5-Miata
Don't ignorantly mistake silence for validation. The thread is regarding relatively new entrants into the sub-$10k realm, a place the MX5-Miata has already been for a long time (most 1st gen's are $2.5k-$5k).
It's because you seemingly have a superficial/generalizing poseur mentality who wears or decorates cars like Bedazzled-attire or cupcakes, not drives/competes the vehicles. But, that's just how I perceive that type of owner.
Individuals w/ an actual performance mentality & interest towards road-courses, tracks, et'al speak highly of the MX5-Miata platform w/ remarkable handling/balance/lightweight/prowess-&-potential... and many of them owning one themselves for its merits, not image portrayed.
In'fact, there are (3) NSX'ers who are automotive performance enthusiasts / "gearheads", within a short drive of me, all three are into HPDE, track-events, road-courses, etc'; their stable:
(A): NA2 NSX CTSC, FD RX7, Buell XB, MX5-Miata
(B): NA2 NSX, 997 911 GT3, MX5-Miata
(C): NA1 NSX, (sold) Ducati 998, MX5-Miata, MX5-Miata