R&T latest road tests. 0-60 in 2.6 seconds. 0-100 in 6.3s. 1/4 in 10.7 at 128.9mph.
No bad at all.
Steve

Steve
As much as I always wanted a 911, I just couldn't connect with mine. It felt like an SUV compared to the NSX. I know it was just me, seeing as it is such a revered driver's car, but it just wasn't for me. To each their own.
2012 GT-R is pretty bad ass. 0-60 2.9sec. 530hp. 90 grand vs ??? for the Porsche 160k range ???
see www.0-60mag.com
Me too. I loved my NSX but my 997s is in a whole new realm in almost every respect but for exclusivity.Lol... and I'm the total opposite".
I love the 997turbo or GT3. I would trade my nsx for either in a heartbeat. I don't understand those that don't like those P-cars. They are unbelievable street and track cars. They did what Honda didn't do by upgrading the car every few years to what it should have been. Honda did well in 1991. After that time caught up to the nsx and we(the public) lost out on the car that could have been the McLaren F1. Porsche makes a great car. Anyone who doubts it should go drive one and you will most likely change your mind. The advancements in technology over the years are second to none from German engineers.
Me too. I loved my NSX but my 997s is in a whole new realm in almost every respect but for exclusivity.
To each his own. But to me the brakes, steering, structural integrity and power of the current 997S is light years ahead of the NSX... as it should be for a much newer car. I'm not taking anything away from the NSX.. hell, I loved mine... but I'm also a realist.No way. My 03 NSX was way more memorable than my 997 Carrera S (which was fully upgraded leather, ceramic brakes, nav, etc). It was nO contest, NSX wins.
Maybe the new 911's are a little better than the old ones, but just the windshield of the NSX in relation to the driver, the seating position, and the angle of the dash on the NSX is enough to blow away a 997 by design alone.
.
To each his own. But to me the brakes, steering, structural integrity and power of the current 997S is light years ahead of the NSX... as it should be for a much newer car. I'm not taking anything away from the NSX.. hell, I loved mine... but I'm also a realist.
I agree that the cabin "feel" of the NSX is more exotic with the sight lines, etc. but the overall cabin in my 997 is way more comfortable, more usable, and more pleasant than my NSX was. The smell of my full leather interior even at nearly 3 years old is to die for.
But you're comparing apples and oranges here. From a pricing standpoint on up, comparing a new 911s to car designed in the late 80's isn't fair to either product.
I love the 997turbo or GT3. I would trade my nsx for either in a heartbeat. I don't understand those that don't like those P-cars. They are unbelievable street and track cars. They did what Honda didn't do by upgrading the car every few years to what it should have been. Honda did well in 1991. After that time caught up to the nsx and we(the public) lost out on the car that could have been the McLaren F1. Porsche makes a great car. Anyone who doubts it should go drive one and you will most likely change your mind. The advancements in technology over the years are second to none from German engineers.
NSX was a one-hit wonder and that's it. Although ahead of its time, the NSX was long surpassed by the current high end sports cars. Sort of like the hare and turtle race and the NSX lost. I am a huge fan of the NSX or else I would not have owned 4. While the NSX was sleeping, Porsche kept on doing what they do best, building the best sports cars of its times. The NSX was once among the greatest sports cars and I think it is still an outstanding consumer product BUT the world has moved on. One drive of my coworker's 2009 997 C4S left me NO doubt that Porsche IS the king. NSX is left in the dust.
Steve
To each his own. But to me the brakes, steering, structural integrity and power of the current 997S is light years ahead of the NSX... as it should be for a much newer car. I'm not taking anything away from the NSX.. hell, I loved mine... but I'm also a realist.
I agree that the cabin "feel" of the NSX is more exotic with the sight lines, etc. but the overall cabin in my 997 is way more comfortable, more usable, and more pleasant than my NSX was. The smell of my full leather interior even at nearly 3 years old is to die for.
But you're comparing apples and oranges here. From a pricing standpoint on up, comparing a new 911s to car designed in the late 80's isn't fair to either product.
($100k used) ? 997 turbo or audi r8?
VegasSpeed said:I think the old NA1 tail-lights look awful though.
For a $100,000 used? First off you don't need that much to buy a 911 turbo used is the point. I would buy two used turbos for that much OR get a 997 GT3 for $60k and save the rest.
I would probably buy a Ford GT since they hold their value well for a $100k if I could.
You do know a 480hp GT-R runs 118-120 trap speeds. So a 530hp will run at most 123-125 trap speeds. At speeds over 120 you need more then the typical 10hp for another 1mph trap speed so it could be even less. On a highway run from a roll the Turbo S would kill the new GT-R so would the 458 and the ZR1. Plus those 2.9 times are from Nissan only .... lets see what others can get and if the same launch control Nissan used in Japan is available here. Not trying to be negative toward the GT-R but all the cars listed above will run 0-60 times in the 2.9-3.3 range and they all run close to 129-130 trap speeds except the GT-R --- so from a dig ---- drivers race for all ---- but roll ons and the GT-R is outmatched.