1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

Re: ....1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

This to me shows more testicle fortitude or "class" then any correct grammer over the internet ever could....
Class has nonthing to do with the way you talk

Arguably so, however correct grammar can be the difference between conveying "testicle fortitude" (persevering sack) and intestinal fortitude. :eek:
 
Re: ....1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

OH MY GOSH..No wonder so many NSX guys Ive come across say they never post here..Some of you are just rediculous...............

:rolleyes:
 
Re: ....1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

Is it ,,,,,, radiculous? :confused:
 
Re: ....1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

It's apparent some people feel that I think I am holy, that is not the case. I am actually interested in what snakey has been writing about, but I find it difficult to understand. He's pushing the limit with his car and I have done the same thing in the past with my cars, it's just that I'm afraid to do so with my NSX. If I can learn from other people's mistakes I can make an informed choice as to how I may want to go FI with my NSX. I have never stated that I think snakey or anyone else with poor spelling is beneath me, but I do find it ironic that he works at a private education facility. I know that this is the internet and things are much more casual, but spelling the word "cool" as "kool" is just confusing for me to comprehend. It's not like the letter 'c' and 'k' are next to each other on the keyboard.

I'm sorry to have taken this thread way off topic, and I apologize to snakey and everyone else who is a bad speller. I too was a bad speller and my parents actually bought me a spelling dictionary when I was kid. Thankfully computers have a spell checker and I can look like I am highly edjumakated (sic). There is some truth to the phrase in my signature line. ;)

9780028617206.gif

we all have a common goal here and share a love for OUR CARS....

SO I understand where you are coming from. Its okay to have a few typos here and there and be excused. However, these are cars are complicated enough and the days are too long to spend allot of time deciphering a post... (in this case I understand what snakey is saying) Some with english as a second language or lil patience may not...

so i understand both points...

I understand fully what snakey is saying.... FLAME ON....
 
Last edited:
Re: ....1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

Ok....Wader under the brige and Ill use spell check from now on.......

BTW..5 psi and 310 rwhp...What you think?
 
Re: ....1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

Ok....Wader under the brige and Ill use spell check from now on.......

BTW..5 psi and 310 rwhp...What you think?

DId you say above you have headers or you didnt? sorry missed it...
 
Re: ....1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

Ok....Wader under the brige and Ill use spell check from now on.......

BTW..5 psi and 310 rwhp...What you think?


Ha ha ha ha.....APRIL FOOLS......I was spelling like that on purpose...LOL


BTW....310 rwhp with the stock headers and ZERO kool down on a dynojet...
 
Re: ....1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

That was funny. Considering you have been spelling that way since you have been posting on this board. Guess the joke was on us.:rolleyes:

Dang..You got me they're..Guess I really do spell that bad...

310 seems kinda low for only 5 psi??????

I thought the CTSC guys were only around 325 rwhp with 6 psi and headers and a kool engine????

Well it is what it is and so far Ive trapped 112 mph in the 1/4 mile with the current 310 rwhp at 1000 ft elevation in 70 degree Hawaiian weather..

Hopeing for 120 plus trapps after the air to water cooling system and 9 psi and AEM...Maybey Im hoping for too much..Guess we'll see soon.
 
Re: ....1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

310 seems kinda low for only 5 psi??????
If I remember correctly I was running about that same HP when I had mine installed.
snakey said:
I thought the CTSC guys were only around 325 rwhp with 6 psi and headers and a kool engine????
I know one person very well that had a Basch and now has the CTSC and he has said that the CT has some much more low end tq than the BBSC ever thought about. Obviously this is due to the two completely different designs of each system. The CTSC seems to be the much more logical choice is everyday, stoplight to stoplight driving is what you are after. I can't comment on track time though.
 
Re: ....1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

I too had a 5 psi BBSC key word is HAD. On my 98 with the SS box after MB tuned it, it put down 390HP not 309. Only mod was the anytime muffler. Now some friendly advice, you are a FOOL if you keep the SS box! After I sold the BBSC the next owner used it and now has a blown motor, the dead kind. Go get the AEM DUDE.:smile:
 
Re: ....1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

I too had a 5 psi BBSC key word is HAD. On my 98 with the SS box after MB tuned it, it put down 390HP not 309. Only mod was the anytime muffler. Now some friendly advice, you are a FOOL if you keep the SS box! After I sold the BBSC the next owner used it and now has a blown motor, the dead kind. Go get the AEM DUDE.:smile:

I don't think he is listening. Won't learn till it happens...:frown:
 
Re: ....1991 BBSC 5 psi dynoed....

your car looks great Snakey from the other posts....I recalled you had to Choose between a High Boost Ctsc vs the one you bought....I know nothing about the SS box...But from all these posts can see its not the way to go............Good Luck on your efforts, but seem like the High Boost Ctsc had all what you are trying to do with the one you bought.....I hope you dont have any regrets....
 
Back
Top