I talked to my local Acura dealer and they told me 42k was the lowest possible..I told them 41.5k was the lowest I'd go. So instead, I bought an RX400h because they were giving 4k off the sticker. :tongue:
Hothonda said:It's not an NSX, but for a 4dr, $50K sedan, it's fine + the
SH-AWD and Aspec set up make it handle as well as any
German sedan...maybe not as fast but still adequate for $15K less and a consistent 20-25mpg.
NsSeX said:Does anyone know if you can still get a RL for Invoice?
NsSeX said:Thanks, right now i'm really torn between trading in my m3 for a RL or poneying up some more$$ and finding myselft a 02+ NSX :biggrin: or just keep my M3 :frown:
Dave Hardy said:M3 to NSX I can see.
M3 to RL makes no sense at all to me.
liftshard said:Maybe he wants a car that runs all the time.
Dave Hardy said:I'm sure that the RL is more reliable than an M3, but still. In my mind, the RL is a glorified accord and is in no way on par with the M3.
liftshard said:What is so great about the M3 again? Oh yeah, "it's a BMW."
Dave Hardy said:I'm sure that the RL is more reliable than an M3, but still. In my mind, the RL is a glorified accord and is in no way on par with the M3.
liftshard said:RL's made in Japan, Accord in the USA.
What is so great about the M3 again? Oh yeah, "it's a BMW."
Dave Hardy said:RL = FWD Midsize Automatic
.
ak said:Supposedly Honda whipped the RL around the Nurburgring and it beat R34 skyline. That's no slouch.
NetViper said:Um no.
RL = AWD Midsize Auto.
In fact, it is the most advanced AWD system on the market according to Honda.
Dave Hardy said:I'll compromise. It's not FWD, but it's also not AWD. It's "AWD". ie - in theory there is some power going to the rear wheels. In reality it will still drive like a FWD car.