I'm looking to get an early NSX (I'm 6'3" so want fixed roof) and there is a lot of cars that still appear to be in really nice shape and have surprising low miles.
Some very pristine examples have less miles than I would put on in a year (probably 4k at most). While the idea of having an "almost new" car from the early 90s seems appealing, I worry that a car that spent decades idle could have a lot of problems in the future. Even if it worked, I can hear Indiana Jones saying "it belongs in a museum!" as I drove it.
Am I right in thinking this? Would a car with 40k or more miles actually be a safer bet?
The actual cost of the car isn't my primary factor since I think all of these cars are going to hold their values or go up if treated well.
Some very pristine examples have less miles than I would put on in a year (probably 4k at most). While the idea of having an "almost new" car from the early 90s seems appealing, I worry that a car that spent decades idle could have a lot of problems in the future. Even if it worked, I can hear Indiana Jones saying "it belongs in a museum!" as I drove it.
Am I right in thinking this? Would a car with 40k or more miles actually be a safer bet?
The actual cost of the car isn't my primary factor since I think all of these cars are going to hold their values or go up if treated well.