What would you guys do first: exahust or a chip? I haven't seen much talk about performance chips on this sight. Is the NSX compatible with them?
Originally posted by naaman:
What would you guys do first: exahust or a chip? I haven't seen much talk about performance chips on this sight. Is the NSX compatible with them?
nsxtasy posted while I was writing mine.I was assuming you had one already.follow his advise and drive your car un modded for a period of time.you may find she is perfect bone stock and your wallet will love you for it.Originally posted by nsxtasy:
You've said you're not planning on getting an NSX for a long time. Wait until you get the car, and live with it for a while as it is, before you start considering mods.
There are chips. Look in the FAQ.
[This message has been edited by nsxtasy (edited 03 August 2002).]
Originally posted by naaman:
I don't really care about high end speed as much as low end torque. I will search the FAQ, but are there any personal prefs as to any NA upgrades to get the most possible low end acceleration
Originally posted by robr:
if you want torque, you're considering buying about the worst performance vehicle on the planet for producing it . if you already want an NSX hopefully you're already very familiar with its plusses and minuses (which are far outweighed by its plusses, but torque is over in the minus column).
Originally posted by naaman:
I feel so ignorant. Let's see if I understand:
The lower the rpms, the less actual work the engine is doing over time and acceleration is directly affected by this.
Regardless of torque, the more rpms (or is it "the closer to the power peak"?), the more work the engine is doing over time, and thus, the faster the acceleration.
So even if an engine is strong (gobs of torque), if it is pulling slow (low rpms), it is not exerting all of it's potential energy (horsepower) to pull the car, and thus slow acceleration.
Generally speaking the more rpms, the more horsepower, up until the power peak, which is where the torque drops low enough for the power to also suffer.
Horsepower climbs even after torque begins to drop because the effort of the engine (rpms) increases faster than the strength (torque) decreases...?
Originally posted by naaman:
The lower the rpms, the less actual work the engine is doing over time and acceleration is directly affected by this.
Originally posted by naaman:
Regardless of torque, the more rpms (or is it "the closer to the power peak"?), the more work the engine is doing over time, and thus, the faster the acceleration.
Originally posted by naaman:
So even if an engine is strong (gobs of torque), if it is pulling slow (low rpms), it is not exerting all of it's potential energy (horsepower) to pull the car, and thus slow acceleration.
Originally posted by naaman:
Generally speaking the more rpms, the more horsepower, up until the power peak, which is where the torque drops low enough for the power to also suffer.
Originally posted by naaman:
Horsepower climbs even after torque begins to drop because the effort of the engine (rpms) increases faster than the strength (torque) decreases...?