Where was DAL at VIR?

Joined
22 September 2004
Messages
2
What happened guys? Was expected great things with the time you guys had to prepare since Mid-Ohio. Was there a problem with the new 3.2L engine you mentioned you installed? Engine problems like that usually mean one of two things, mechanics are taking shortcuts or drivers aren't taking care of the car. Given that, probably time for you guys to find a new mechanic/engine builder.

Saw you out in the first couple of sessions, were a little slower than in practice for the VIR race last year I think, but that could be anything. Then qualifying and the race and no #51. Hope its nothing bad and you guys will be back in action at Barber next week.

Jon in Baltimore
 
Overheating problems

I am hoping I am not letting this out too soon, but Rob told me Friday they were having overheating problems, and called me Saturday to say they would not be able to run the race Saturday afternoon. I did not ask any more details.

Here is a picture courtesy of www.theracesite.com
 

Attachments

  • dal_51.jpg
    dal_51.jpg
    41.6 KB · Views: 273
We had unresolved engine misfiring problems (Bent valves, MSD failure, AEM failure, faulty wiring, bad coil…?), but ultimately a simple $100 part put a pitiful close to our miserable season. We blew a radiator hose in practice… after getting towed in, we discovered that one of the head gaskets was leaking. We don’t know if the over heating from the ruptured hose was the cause of the gasket failure, or if the gasket failure lost enough water to over heat and blow the hose… either way we needed to pull the engine before we could race again. VIR was out and we soon found out that Barber was hopeless. California would be a loosing battle with the current rule configuration.
Over the past 5 races our luck has worked the Goodson staff extremely hard, so when we learned that it would be impossible to schedule this engine repair before Barber (on the following Wednesday), we hardly put up a fight.
Barber was our last big hope for this season. We expected a top 10 at VIR and a top 3 at Barber. Barber is a track that favors good handling and doesn’t accentuate high horsepower. Another benefit is the relative newness of this facility (It’s hard to beat 10 years of track knowledge) We tested here earlier in the year with our 3.0 5-speed configuration and were running times equal to last years Pole position. We since dialed in better with our suspension, we gained improved use of our HP with an ignition modification, improved our gearing, and increased our HP with this new 3.2 engine.

Despite our revised web site, newly released sponsor proposal, track experience, and tons of valuable research, design and knowledge with the NSX… I’m afraid were out of options. DAL will likely not continue to campaign the NSX next year without a small miracle. Were out of personal money, and don’t have a good track record to expect a sponsor. Even if we decided to stick it out and personally invest what it took to just get by, the rules for the NSX would make it non competitive for a points race. The NSX is a platform that neither Honda nor the Grand-Am association is willing to endorse or support. I may be redundant with previous posts, but we chose the NSX because of our pure opinion that this would be the best platform for winning races in a street stock class. And in true form it is the best, but in order for a racing association to thrive as a business they need to allow concessions to the less competitive cars for a more even field. This in theory is acceptable (I for one would rather the manufacturers step up and make better cars), unfortunately the current configuration allows the manipulation of results based on a number of potential variables, and can actually be used to control the outcome of race’s with more weight then a driver or even a team. We have learned a lot about pro racing and understand that any business including a race association, wants results that will most benefit the business. We also understand that it is better business for a series to support the manufacturers that advertise the most and will continue the growth of the race organization and the series following of supporters. As a racer we picked the best car, as a team and business it wouldn’t make sense to campaign a car that isn’t supported by the manufacturer. Were looking at other current (supported) Acura’s, but find it hard to give up on the better engineered car.

Oh- another error in our previous thinking was that to run a Porsche for instance would be foolish. We figured that we would get lost in the “Me Too” club of same old cars.
But where there is quantity there is an interest in keeping them happy… if 25% of the field were to disappear because they weren’t competitive, the series wouldn’t have a good venue to watch. Consequently the quality teams that are good can take those Porsche rules and race at less then 100% to stay competitive. The good teams sand bag to keep the rules from changing rather then step it up to be competitive again. Then theres the Cadillac… they were allowed enough concessions (before they ever raced) to actually win races? Ever track one?

I probably started to sound bitter a long time ago… I’m accustom to winning and work hard for it, quitting doesn’t sit so good either.

I will have to somehow share the sponsor proposal we put together. Eric is mainly responsible for it’s quality with minor input from the rest of the team. It’s awesome.
 
Wow...and not in a good way. If there was anything I could do to help besides raid the retirement fund, I'd do it. You guys deserve better and I have faith that sooner or later, this whole experience will be entirely worthwhile.
 
Well I'm very sorry to hear of your frustration, but I can't say I'm surprised by some of it. It has been no secret for a long time now that professional racing, like many pro sports, is above all else "entertainment". NASCAR taught everyone that "close racing" is more important to American fans and sponsors, including manufacturers, than "hones racing". It's one thing to fine-tune rules prior to each season to level the field between nearly comparable cars, and quite another to massage them week to week. What a joke. I rarely even bother to watch anymore, and when I do it is purely to observe driving technique and passing moves or to get a look at a particular track. Although I could spend hours ranting about issues in amateur racing organizations, it is still the closest thing to what I consider true racing.

None the less I was excited to see you guys trying to run an NSX and I hope that something changes so you can get out there again next year.
 
Were not giving up yet, we have invested a lot into this and have learned so much that would help us in the future. Both Vaughn and myself are committed to racing at the highest level of sport car road racing and are going to do anything we can to continue.
 
I appreciate the updates.I'm sad but at the same time encouraged by your resolve.
 
Here are the ideas we have for next year-

a) Temporarily give up on pro racing, and sell everything
b) Get a sponsor that would fund a stronger pro effort (We have solutions in mind… even for the existing rule set, they just cost more then we have)
c) Find at least two driving partners that can afford to bring money for equalizing the investment in equipment, and split the future cost equally between 4+ instead of 2. We would rebuild a second car to accommodate 4 drivers.
d) We may get a potential deal for running a current Acura like a TSX.
e) Sell everything and join another team (similar to “c”) but we would be the new additions, and the other teams would be running something other then an NSX. We have more then one team in mind, but partnerships are difficult to iron out.
 
good luck with whichever option you choose. as always, keep us posted. There is nothing more exciting for me than sportscar racing.
 
Back
Top