2005, last year made.
+1 Im with this guy. Thats if you dont mind the non flip up lights. They always seem to go for the most money. So there must be some kind of higher demand for them.
All else being equal, a 2001 would be the most desirable.
It totally depends on what happend during the model runs. Early Trans Am's are worth way more than the last of the last. Typically technology, styling, power, etc grow and progress to a point where later versions can be worth more - but only if there is something significantly different or evolutionary and even that is largely due to them JUST being newer. Plenty of models have value in pockets all through the runs (Mustang, Vette, Camaro). The unique thing about the NSX is that to the average guy, they were largely unchanged for the entire production. Some argue the early cars are more raw, lighter and in some ways better than the revisions...more at the core of the orginal concept.All last of the last are worth the most. Nsx, 08 magnum srt8, Lamborghini diablo and Ferrari 288 to name a few. A 2005 white nsx is worth more than a Zanardi IMHO.
It totally depends on what happend during the model runs. Early Trans Am's are worth way more than the last of the last. Typically technology, styling, power, etc grow and progress to a point where later versions can be worth more - but only if there is something significantly different or evolutionary and even that is largely due to them JUST being newer. Plenty of models have value in pockets all through the runs (Mustang, Vette, Camaro). The unique thing about the NSX is that to the average guy, they were largely unchanged for the entire production. Some argue the early cars are more raw, lighter and in some ways better than the revisions...more at the core of the orginal concept.
The collectors are speculating now on low-mile, stock 91's (Zanardi's aside) even though the whole line has gotten a ton of press lately.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Il3Z5adYs_Q
If your budget allows, look for a 2001 coupe. Good luck though.