Vance,
I was wondering why it dynoed lower on Dynojet. Since Dynojet always dyno a little bit higher than Dynodynamic.
Not to feed your ego, but looking the graph and info. 295rwhp is uncorrected, written on the graph you posted, under those condition it is about 309.75rwhp corrected. With 1.03~1.05 correction factor. The computer calculate by itself, you have to check what they have on file.
On Dynojet weather sensors are built into the dyno, there is no magic buttons. You can ask and check the graph with C/F. Near 310rwhp corrected is about right.
No wonder Erick got really low #s. He is got roughtly 256 uncorrected 268.8rwhp with C/F and heavy wheels, maybe 270~275rwhp with lighter wheels on same dyno jet. Maybe close to 290~295rwhp with addition of headers. His NSX is not wimp either.
Any one who have ridden or driven my car will tell you, the car feels just as fast as NA1 with first gen standard boost CTSC. And if you question it... Don't hate, or jealous or bitter or....:biggrin:
Remember you always stress, it is always feels faster riding in passenger seat. 100% true, however you will always still feel the difference in faster car. Ride in S2k or Accord then hop onto NSX or C6. There is a big difference.
Stardard CTSC even the old one is good for 330~340rwhp, if it is a 95~96 NSX-T or NA1 with widebody+big wheels. The difference would not be much if at all, but if it were a NSX that weights the same or lighter with 330~340rwhp, then there will be difference, gearing advantage not enough to make up for the difference. Power to weight ratio + a little bit of gearing is what determine the speed. It is really no rocket science.
Take Simo and John's Gruppe M for example. They both handed me the key, the least I could do for them was drive the shit out of it to show my appreciation then give a true honest 3rd person opinion. Only way to truely test it out a car is definitely not in 1st gear in a parking lot. Got to run through the gears, squeeze out the last rev before fuel cut. Simo's NSX is actually very shockingly close to John's old set up, 1st gear almost the same due about 300~350lbs lighter than John's NSX, but as the car get rolling I could easily feel the power difference. While there is 80rwhp difference, the car felt a lot closer in power, maybe only felt just off by 30~40rwhp. Don't know how much of that was contributed to the sound, but my ears were nearly bleeding after driving the crap out of Simo's NSX.
The feel is deceiving as the NA1 have 5spd, louder car always make the car sound faster than it actually is. I would say because of the high HP# + 6spd, it will feel nearly as fast as standard CTSC + widebody in 2nd gear. From a 3rd person perspective, true honestly review, 1st gear is your weakness/disadvantage. 2nd gear is your main strength/advantage.
You be shocked by the difference there maybe. If you are not afraid to find out, you and Erick and his supposely far inferior NA1 to NA2 can line up and do a rolling acceleration from 50~115mph. That is the way to test and find out the truth and the difference. There is no doubt which is quicker but the question is how much difference. I can sit in either yours or his NSX to add weight penalty and get it on video:biggrin:.
:biggrin: 
