I did consider going 93+, but I think I might like the original suspension since it is more a "driver's" suspension. The '93 was supposedly tweaked for "average people".
Wikipedia notes:
These changes to the suspension geometry and tire sizes were made in response to journalist reports that the MR2 was prone to "snap-oversteer". As a counterpoint to the snap-oversteer phenomenon of the MR2, other journalists point out that most mid-engine and rear engine sports and super cars exhibit similar behaviour, and that a change to the driver's response to oversteer is really the problem, and not the fault of the car. In any car, braking shifts the weight forward, and acceleration to the rear. Because of the MR2's exceptional ability to accelerate out of corners due to its rear-drive, mid-engine arrangement, many drivers would apply the throttle too aggressively, too early, gaining too much speed, and inevitably lifting the throttle. This lifting would shift the weight forward while causing the rear suspension to toe-out--the recipe for non-power-on oversteer, or even a spin.
When improper steering inputs were made attempting to correct this non-power-on oversteer, the rear of the MR2 would swing one way, then wildly (and quickly) the other--thus the term "snap" oversteer. Toyota elected to change the MR2 suspension and tires to reduce the likelihood that this would occur, though many drivers would lament the change and claim that it "neutered" the sharp edge the MR2 was known for.
Any further thoughts since you have owned both the NSX and MR2?
