This is interesting but odd

[bangbang001]

http://www.kbb.com/KBB/UsedCars/PricingReport.aspx?YearId=2003&Mileage=5000&VehicleClass=UsedCar&ManufacturerId=2&ModelId=13&PriceType=Private+Party&VehicleId=1759&SelectionHistory=1759%7c29834%7c30316%7c0%7c0%7c67635%7ctrue%7c67638%7ctrue%7c67706%7ctrue&Condition=Good&QuizConditions=

http://www.kbb.com/KBB/UsedCars/PricingReport.aspx?YearId=2002&Mileage=39000&VehicleClass=UsedCar&ManufacturerId=2&ModelId=13&PriceType=Private+Party&VehicleId=3378&SelectionHistory=3378%7c29834%7c30316%7c0%7c0%7c130425%7ctrue%7c130426%7ctrue%7c130499%7ctrue&Condition=Excellent&QuizConditions=

I have contact KBB to ask how and why would a 2002 with 34k more miles than a 2003 value be higher

The representative told me they would get back with me on this issue.

Maybe someone here can explain.
Nada data book has the 2003 value higher than the 2002

 

[White92]

Books have never really applied to cars like these and probably never will. Their worth what someone is willing to pay, not what a book says.

 

[Sarge]

+10 An NSX isnt even as common as a lambo.