The epitome of "Oooops!!!"
- Thread starter Jim
- Start date
- Joined
- 18 April 2003
- Messages
- 470
re-check your link...nothing is happening
svalleynsx said:
???? It works for me.
- Joined
- 24 May 2002
- Messages
- 1,431
It works with QuickTime.
That cop is negligent twice. The gun should never have gone off and if it did go off it should have been a head or body shot. Cops only shoot to kill. She missed.
That cop is negligent twice. The gun should never have gone off and if it did go off it should have been a head or body shot. Cops only shoot to kill. She missed.
- Joined
- 18 April 2003
- Messages
- 470
Cool. Thanks. Not very pretty after viewing it.
WTH was that about?
At least it didn't hit the vette...
Cops are trained to shoot to neutralize the threat, not to kill. Most law enforcement training trains to shoot center of mass, not at the head. This officer's negligence was in placing her finger on the trigger, when one is holding a firearm the finger should always be off the trigger until one is ready to engage a target, I don't think this officer meant to fire the gun.
Let's not forget the ultimate equation:
women + a)_____ = b)_____
In this case, blank "a" would be guns and "b" ......
women + a)_____ = b)_____
In this case, blank "a" would be guns and "b" ......
You are absolutely wrong. If a threat is facing the officer and poses a direct threat, it is shoot to kill. I have several police officers in my family and have asked this question over and over again.
oh and uhhhh what'd she hit? him or the other cop?
Hmm, mine played for about 1/2 of second then clicked off. 