seeing as i keep seeing posts on ferrari and lambo unreliability, i thought id put my 2 cents in. having owned several older 308's, 328's and a testarossa in the past, i have to say there reliability was quite good, actually, i never had a problem throughout my years of ownership, although i only had the testarossa for about 6 months, hated that car. in terms of lambo reliability, im on my 3rd, owned the first 2 for about 3 years, and they were also terrific. my old 1987 countach, which people say is the most unreliable car, had approximately 70,000km, the motor was never out, original clutch, and one valve adjustment. the lambos are far easier maintenence wise then ferraris, since they use timing chains, not belts. i cant speak for my new sv had it only about 3 months, same as my acura. no problems yet. my friend has a 98 sv, owned since new, same mods as mine including 150 shot, 3 years of drag racing, 200mph + blasts, daily driven, 45,000 miles, never had a problem. in terms of the new murcielago, that should be a beast, preliminary tests by a german mag put performance @ 3.5 to 60mph, and the quarter mile in 11.5 @123. cant wait for that one. in terms now of my acura's reliability, 3 months = 1 water pump failure=$1000.00, including new timing belt. chalk a point up for the lambo!