400HP Turbo S2000 widebody
Tan
NSXLuvr said:are you sure about the reliability of the turbo. I thought that the S/C's were more durable in a s2k.
Ojas said:
Elite said:A friend of mine wanted to buy an S2000 and do a similar buildup. But after some research found out the drive train cannot hold up. And I mean more than just axle's. The rearend completely comes apart. And at this point I do not think anyone has any kind of fix or replacement for it. If there is.... he will buy one tomorrow and make huge power. Its been his dream for a while.
NetViper said:That looks bad ass!
MRFreeze said:Something else to note, the 400hp S2K is rated at the crank (~340 rwh), the 500hp one is at the wheel! That is nearly 600hp. Simply amazing for a streetable non sleeved F20C. Probably wouldn't last long at that boost level though .
The General said:Why is it that an s2k can make around 600 crank horsepower out of a 2 liter 4 banger, while nsx tuners struggle to break 500 with a similarly designed engine that is 50%+ larger in displacement? By this logic, it seems that a sleeved NSX motor, set up with a 23-24psi turbo system like this one (with higher flow for the larger engine of course) would make 700+ HP. Are the NSX turbo tuners holding back on us, or is there some other reason this can't/hasn't been done on an NSX?
Tantheman said:He got two speeding tickets already and now can not afford the car.
Tan
Chris@SoS said:
We've developed a S2000 turbo system and having it running on our 2002 for testing. The S2000 with bottom end grunt is fabulous!
Cheers,
-- Chris
It works very well. I know a couple of people that have it. After exploding thier rear ends they had to get it.Comptech manufactures a brace with reinforced studs to take care of this problem