31 for the US. Canada not yet published.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
They sold fewer in the USA in May (but a lot more in April).31? that's pretty shit. didn't they sell a lot more in May?
278 sold in the USA so far for 2017 (which probably includes some cars now offered for sale as used despite having a tiny number of miles).what's the actual number of cars in actual garages of real humans for the year?
What is wrong with this company?
I wonder if they will have an event in Monterey this year. I would target the car clubs associated with big tech companies for special invites. ).
Does the Club raffle the tickets ?
The CR-Z was too low on power. Had they gave it 200hp, it would had been much more fun. Even if it didn't had hybrid technology, at 130hp, guarantee flop anyway. Think about it. Original CRX Si had more power some 20 years ago. My beautiful Nissan NV200 cargo van in the pic (background) below is arguably more fun, faster, and handles better than CR-Z. Maybe not, but definitely much more functional : )These sales number are really disappointing. I don't recall that the 1st generation suffered such early poor sales. I'm afraid I can't see the driving events significantly altering people's perception of the vehicle to elevate the sales numbers. Overall, this does not bode well for the car. As someone else mentioned, Honda/Acura's desire to follow the green movement is going to be the downfall of the vehicle (similar to CR-Z, neat car with a lame drivetrain).
Sadly, the hybrid drivetrain is likely a turn-off for a number of potential customers. The car itself is aesthetically pleasing, but the drivetrain seems to be a turn-off. I'm not talking about the performance numbers rather the fact that it is a hybrid and its associated complexity.