Rambo Granny

Joined
11 July 2007
Messages
532
Location
Danbury , Connecticut
RamboGranny.jpg


The Rambo Granny of Melbourne , Australia

Gun-toting granny Ava Estelle, 81, was so ticked-off when two thugs raped her 18-year-old granddaughter that she tracked the unsuspecting ex-cons down... and shot off their testicles.

The old lady spent a week hunting those men down -and, when she found them, she took revenge on them in her own special way, said Melbourne police investigator Evan Delp.

Then she took a taxi to the nearest police station, laid the gun on the sergeant's desk and told him as calm as could be: 'Those bastards will never rape anybody again, by God.'

Cops say convicted rapist and robber Davis Furth, 33, lost both his penis and his testicles when outraged Ava opened fire with a 9-mm pistol in the hotel room where he and former prison cell mate Stanley Thomas, 29, were holed up.

The wrinkled avenger also blew Thomas' testicles to kingdom come, but doctors managed to save his mangled penis, police said. 'The one guy, Thomas, didn't lose his manhood, 'but the doctor I talked to said he won't be using it the way he used to,' Detective Delp told reporters. 'Both men are still in pretty bad shape, 'but I think they're just happy to be alive after what they've been through.'

The Rambo Granny swung into action August 21 after her granddaughter Debbie was carjacked and raped in broad daylight by two knife-wielding creeps in a section of town bordering on skid row... 'When I saw the look on my Debbie's face that night in the hospital, 'I decided I was going to go out and get those bastards myself ''cause I figured the Law would go easy on them,' recalled the retired library worker.. 'And I wasn't scared of them, either - because I've got me a gun and I've been shootin' all my life. 'And I wasn't dumb enough to turn it in when the law changed about owning one.'

So, using a police artist's sketch of the suspects and Debbie's description of the sickos, tough-as-nails Ava spent seven days prowling the wino-infested neighborhood where the crime took place till she spotted the ill-fated rapists entering their flophouse hotel. 'I knew it was them the minute I saw 'em, but I shot a picture of 'em anyway' and took it back to Debbie and she said sure as hell, it was them,' the oldster recalled...

'So I went back to that hotel and found their room and knocked on the door, 'and the minute the big one opened the door, I shot 'em right square between the legs,'right where it would really hurt 'em most, you know. 'Then I went in and shot the other one 'as he backed up pleading to me to spare him.' Then I went down to the police station and turned myself in..'

Now, baffled lawmen are trying to figure out exactly how to deal with the vigilante granny. 'What she did was wrong, and she broke the law, but it is difficult to throw an 81-year-old woman in prison,' Det. Delp said, 'especially when 3 million people in the city want to nominate her for Mayor.'

DEPORT HER TO AMERICA - WE NEED HER!
 
should've shot them dead and not turn herself in- pieces of s..t were not worth her honesty.
 
reminds me of my grandmother. grapes of wrath oakie, absolutely tough as nails but as sweet a grandmother as anybody could want.

after my grandfather died, she used to go camping by herself out in the wild areas of california. slept in a small tent and kept a loaded 38 under her pillow... said "they might get in, hal, but they'll never get out alive."

good for this woman.
 

Are you really surprised?

My Mom sends me this kind of stuff all the time, usually advocating gun ownership (as this does) including quips about how no one should ever turn in, or surrender their right to own a gun. The stories are generally false, or heavily glorified.

This is not to say that I am not a gun advocate (I have several guns) but I honestly believe propaganda in either direction is more harmful than helpful, and the basic wording of the law is the only justification one should really need.

P
 
Thanks for the link , I am going to send this back to the guy who sent me this in a email.

Grrrrrr :frown:

No sense getting bummed about it- Just think about it as an entertaining story (it is). That is what I do with my Mom's fwds- but I actually have sent her back enough snopes links now that she is checking them before she sends them out.:wink:

P
 
Are you really surprised?

My Mom sends me this kind of stuff all the time, usually advocating gun ownership (as this does) including quips about how no one should ever turn in, or surrender their right to own a gun. The stories are generally false, or heavily glorified.

This is not to say that I am not a gun advocate (I have several guns) but I honestly believe propaganda in either direction is more harmful than helpful, and the basic wording of the law is the only justification one should really need.

P

not surprised just wondering 'why bother'- i guess some people are bored.
 
not surprised just wondering 'why bother'- i guess some people are bored.

It is agenda based- just like advertising. The idea here is to appeal to your sense of "justice". Look at the lines in the story-

Rambo Granny said:
'When I saw the look on my Debbie's face that night in the hospital, 'I decided I was going to go out and get those bastards myself ''cause I figured the Law would go easy on them,'

and

Rambo Granny said:
'And I wasn't scared of them, either - because I've got me a gun and I've been shootin' all my life. 'And I wasn't dumb enough to turn it in when the law changed about owning one.'

There is a very real climate of fear amongst gun owners that our government might try to remove our guns from our possession in the interest of protecting us from ourselves. The idea being that getting guns off the street will reduce gun violence. The problem with that thinking is that real threat isn't amongst law abiding gun owners who purchased their firearms legally. The real threat is the domain of outlaws who could give a rats ass if the gun they intend to use in the commission of a crime is legal or not.

Because of this climate of fear there are elements of gun advocacy looking toward any sort of method to spread the word that guns in the hands of decent, and morally correct people are the best defense against "evil doers". Fabrications such as the email this thread is based upon are examples of such.

The irony is that in it's attempt to appeal to justice it uses an example of circumventing the justice system- vigilantism does nothing to further the cause of keeping guns legal, it just makes gun owners look like a bunch of trigger happy fanatics looking for an excuse to subvert the established criminal justice system in order to blow some rapists balls off.

As a gun owner, and advocate- this isn't the way I wish to be viewed- and like I said I feel the wording of the law is plenty justification for my right.

I'm not out stalking the streets looking for some sort of retribution- but if someone breaks into my house where my family and I intend to be safe, they had better hope we aren't home, or they WILL face deadly force. Colorado law is in my favor.

P
 
Last edited:
Because of this climate of fear there are elements of gun advocacy looking toward any sort of method to spread the word that guns in the hands of decent, and morally correct people are the best defense against "evil doers". Fabrications such as the email this thread is based upon are examples of such.
P

I will admit freely that after seeing the facts , this email that was sent to me is indeed a hoax . However , guns save far more lives than they take. More guns make everyone safer. Period. If everyone is unarmed the only people who have guns will be criminals or police. Where are the police when you need them ? Probably pulling over someone in a NSX for going 5 mph over the limit - or - having an illegal air cleaner ( both very good use of police time )

You can dial 911 - I will dial .357 . What is the average police response time in your city ? 2 mins ? 5 mins ? 10 mins ? I call pull out my concealed handgun in under 2 seconds.

If every woman in this country had a gun and knew how to use it , we could eliminate the word ' Rape ' from the dictionary. Talk about empowering women , I am all for it.

Some notes from Australia ( a little old but somewhat current )

Here's a thought to warm some of your hearts...
From: Ed Chenel , A police officer in Australia


Hi Yanks, I thought you all would like to see the real figures from Down Under.

It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by our own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.

The first year results are now in:
Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent,
Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent;
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!

In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. (Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not and criminals still possess their guns!)

While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since the criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.

There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly, while the resident is at home.

Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in 'successfully ridding Australian society of guns..' You won't see this on the American evening news or hear your governor or members of the State Assembly disseminating this information.

The Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens.




Answer this question - Why does Scotland Yard now carry guns when they did not carry guns 20 years ago ? Bobbies used to be famous for the fact that all they carried was a billy club and a whistle.

BTW- the UK just recently passed a complete gun ban and crime has gone up markedly.
 
[QUOTE
The irony is that in it's attempt to appeal to justice it uses an example of circumventing the justice system- vigilantism does nothing to further the cause of keeping guns legal, it just makes gun owners look like a bunch of trigger happy fanatics looking for an excuse to subvert the established criminal justice system in order to blow some rapists balls off.
/QUOTE]

exactly, i have to say that your last post was quite spot on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You can dial 911 - I will dial .357 . What is the average police response time in your city ? 2 mins ? 5 mins ? 10 mins ? I call pull out my concealed handgun in under 2 seconds.

Cragar: please Read the rest of my post- I am a gun owner, and advocate. I just don't feel we are well served by propaganda, and falsehoods disseminated via email which depict gun owners as vigilantes. That is the kind of image that only feeds the anti-gun lobby.

P
 
Last edited:
it cetainly is an utopian idea to expect everyone to turn in their guns, criminals included:confused:

Excellent point. Criminals don't turn in their guns at ' gun buyback ' programs. It was hard enough for them to skirt the laws or steal one in the first place.

I have been waiting for them to have a gun buyback in my area. Why ?

If you ever notice every time they have one of these it is a media event with lots of politios showing up for the photo ops and press releases to make you think they are doing a great job fighting crime with your tax dollars ?

Next time you see one on TV or the newspaper look to see what kinds of guns they are getting. Mostly junk. If you had a legally owned gun that was worth a good coin you could sell it to a gun dealer and get a fair amount for the value of the gun. Why would you trade it in for $50 at a gun buy back program if it was worth $200-$500 or more ?

I have an Iver-Johnson .32 cal revolver that was given to me as a gift from a friend when I purchased a nice shotgun that he owned. The pistol is about 50 years old. It is very cheaply constructed with poor quality metals , the chrome finish is flaking off the gun everywhere and it looks like heck. The worst part is that the gun is no longer safe to fire due to the timing is off between the cylinders and the barrel.

I can't wait till they have a gun buyback program so I can get 50 bucks for it.

That same gun in the hands of a felon is worth far more than a measly 50 dollars.

Your tax dollars at work.
 
Cragar: please Read the rest of my post- I am a gun owner, and advocate. I just don't feel we are well served by propaganda, and falsehoods disseminated via email which depict gun owners as vigilantes. That is the kind of image that only feeds the anti-gun lobby.

P

I take it you have never needed to pull out a gun in the time of dire need. I have had to twice. Both times justified. ( police agreed with justification )

I do not mean to come across as Charles Bronson in ' Deathwish ' but I have had been put in peril's way twice and I am still alive to tell about it.

Your life changes forever , Yes , maybe it has warped my head a little but maybe not , I think it has just given me more clarity to how quickly your life can be snuffed out.
 
No sense getting bummed about it- Just think about it as an entertaining story (it is). That is what I do with my Mom's fwds- but I actually have sent her back enough snopes links now that she is checking them before she sends them out.:wink:

P


Mental note to self - Use Snopes more often :wink:
 
I take it you have never needed to pull out a gun in the time of dire need. I have had to twice. Both times justified. ( police agreed with justification )

I do not mean to come across as Charles Bronson in ' Deathwish ' but I have had been put in peril's way twice and I am still alive to tell about it.

Your life changes forever , Yes , maybe it has warped my head a little but maybe not , I think it has just given me more clarity to how quickly your life can be snuffed out.

Not sure what you are getting at there- I completely and totally agree with the (yours/mine) right to carry.

Remember that preacher who was shot and killed @ the pulpit while giving his sermon?

Story HERE

That's all the argument you need to justify a carry license in my opinion...

See how compelling the truth can be?

Crazy world...

P
 
Last edited:
It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by our own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.

WTF this was 15 years ago , I know because I handed "most" of my Guns in for collection . Only the crappy ones though :wink:

And for information the largest massacre by a single man in peace time recorded happened here in Tasmania by a crazed Loon with an SKS and other piece of shit chinese arms , gunned down 35 men, women and children while they ate brunch. Pretty fucked up stuff . My Tax dollars are still paying for this twit to live


Read on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Arthur_massacre_(Australia))

Really Graphic read that is , especially gunning down little kids at point blank. I will never say people should have the right to bare arms , but they must be kept from Crazies like this :(
 
Last edited:
Back
Top