Heading to my first track event at California Speedway and need to purchase a helmet. Any recommendations on best helmet in the $250 - $400 range? Also, best place to purchase on-line (good price, return policy etc.).
Thanks.
Thanks.
Absolutely true. Don't get them mail-order. They'll tell you you can measure your head, but that won't give any indication of comfort. If you have them shipped, there's a good chance it won't be comfortable and you'll either have to send it back, or live with one that's not comfortable.92 white 0650 said:Fit is your first thru 3rd priority. You'll need to try them on
No offense to my friend Ted, but I respectfully urge caution regarding getting the older rating. Incidentally, there's a typo; the ratings are "SA" (SA2000, SA2005) rather than "S". Snell ratings are issued every five years, and most groups holding track events permit the two most recent ratings, with an extra year to permit people to buy helmets with the new ratings. So this year (2006) is the last year that helmets rated SA95 (from 1995) are permitted. If you buy an SA2000 helmet, it will only be allowed for the next 5-6 years, whereas an SA2005 helmet will be allowed for 10-11 years. If the savings on the older ratings were 50 percent, that might make sense, but they're not usually all that much.92 white 0650 said:you might look for the Snell S2000 rating rather than the S2005 (most current) rating. Rumor has it they are virtually identical in design, but the S2000 will be on sale cheap compared to the new S2005's.
Ken, what you said makes perfect sense for a long term mature sensible track day driver like yourself. But a lot of boy racer personalities come and go and don't fit that mold. He may not be around in 5-6 months, let alone 5-6 years, so why pay top $$ for a few track days. Of course, that assumes what I hear is right; there was no significant technical improvement in design and he'll have the same protection in a new SA2000 as an SA2005.it will only be allowed for the next 5-6 years, whereas an SA2005 helmet will be allowed for 10-11 years.
Neck collars are fine for comfort maybe, but cannot prevent basal skull fracture which can kill any properly harnessed racer in any race car at speeds as low as 30 mph. Only a head and neck restraint will protect against that. The racing world is getting somewhat more sophisticated and even moving away from the strap devices as they are only marginally better than nothing. Rumor has it that SCCA may require any head and neck restraint to be the carbon fiber type (HANS, R-3 or Hutchens II). Interestingly enough, they won't require drivers to wear a restraint, only that the restraint be one of those 3, if a driver wears anything at all. Not sure I follow that logic, but we'll see how that plays out. I'm more interested to know if that rule eliminates neck collars which are pretty scarce on the racing grid anyway.the ability to use a NECK COLLAR with a full face helmet to help prevent hyperflexion of your neck and prevent severing your spinal cord - you know: the NASCAR injury.
SaberX said:I'll be getting a 5pt harness setup soon. Should I be concerned about the "basal skull fracture" and the extra neck support? It almost sounds like you'd be safer in a stock seat belt that allows you to hit an airbag?: confused:
SaberX, have you seen this thread on 5 pt harnesses? If not, I hope it changes your mind about a 5 pt versus a 6 pt.I'll be getting a 5pt harness setup soon
John @ Microsoft stated the issue pretty well. For your situation specifically, I'll add this: Almost everything in motorsports is a compromise and very individual to the driver and the car. So, the general easy answer (which costs us nothing) is to tell you in no uncertain terms that you should spend $835 on a HANS device or equal if you're going to install a full harness. And the corollary to that is if you're not willing to spend that money, a full harness can possibly do more harm than the stock belts/air bag simply because the torso is restrained and the head, which is not, will snap forward and try to fly off your shoulders. However, a counter question might be, "how close to the steering wheel do you sit (meaning, would you likely have the air bag to cushion/restrain your head)?Should I be concerned about the "basal skull fracture" and the extra neck support? It almost sounds like you'd be safer in a stock seat belt that allows you to hit an airbag?
I had heard others make this claim, so a few months ago, when I was shopping for a new SA2005 helmet to replace my SA95, I purposely tried on Arai helmets as well as Bell, G Force, Impact, and others. I found that the Arai helmets were much too small and tight (one, that was allegedly my size, I couldn't even put on). I found that the Bell helmets had the best fit and comfort (snug but not painful). Perhaps your experience will be different... or perhaps not.Red said:Arai makes the most comfortable helmets