Great find! I believe the show's host says it well. The new NSX has incredibly large shoes to fill. Not only must the new car exceed the performance capabilities of the prior NSX, but it must maintain (preferably exceed) the original's driving flavor/feel all the while maintaining world class reliability and lasting beauty/design.
Having also seen the videos of Mr. Klaus (who presents very well), I believe that he is very much in touch with what the new NSX has to be in order for it to be a success. It seems that Honda has given him the opportunity to make a lasting statement to the automotive world and I think he will deliver. I just hope the bean-counters stay out of his way.
The vid makes me think that Honda should add or change the name NSX. Most halo cars' successors were given different names. For example Ferrari has F40,50,Enzo,LaFarrari; Lambo has Countach, Murci,Aventador; Mclaren has F1,P1. For variety of reasons one being it will preserve the legacy of the predecessors. Loosely associated with HSC, it can be named HSX for Hybrid Sports Experiment.
I can only think of ~5year gaps (RX-7/RX-8, Super Ferrari models). Also, the Ford Thunderbird comes to mind, a model that I actually liked the latest iteration for 02-'05 (of which not many others in the marketplace shared my viewpoint).funny thing the nsx .......has there ever been a 10 year gap in the genesis of any other major manufacturers models...
Then everyone would bitch and moan that it wasn't called an "NSX," that Honda was giving away brand equity, was a stupid business move, and a typical decision of a foolish modern Honda.
911, SL, Corvette, Vantage, Mustang, M3, Camaro, GT-R, M5, etc. The effectiveness of maintaining a beloved model name is marketing canon. Either way, I just hope it gets built.