http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/automobiles/19INSURE.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Worth a read. Here's an excerpt:
"Many insurers have redefined the term 'racing.' Policies have long had exclusions for racing, but it was defined as a 'timed event.'
High-performance driver education neatly avoided that definition. Although cars may take laps at top speed, they aren’t timed.
That loophole did not escape the attention of insurers...so the industry began to add a new exclusion to its policies in the late 1990s, with most companies adding it within the last few years. Instead of trying to define racing, policies exclude damage at any location that could accommodate racing, timed or not. That eliminated coverage during high-performance driving schools and track days."
Worth a read. Here's an excerpt:
"Many insurers have redefined the term 'racing.' Policies have long had exclusions for racing, but it was defined as a 'timed event.'
High-performance driver education neatly avoided that definition. Although cars may take laps at top speed, they aren’t timed.
That loophole did not escape the attention of insurers...so the industry began to add a new exclusion to its policies in the late 1990s, with most companies adding it within the last few years. Instead of trying to define racing, policies exclude damage at any location that could accommodate racing, timed or not. That eliminated coverage during high-performance driving schools and track days."