For once it is quite wll done. Pricing are quite correct, so are the change by year.
http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/used/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/2334.htm
http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/used/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/2334.htm
NSX used car guide
- Thread starter gheba_nsx
- Start date
True, they are off
. I watched the '97+ prices and they seemed correct. They also miss the snap ring but they catch door and sound system problems. They also state correctely that the early model sold for over 100k$! The Road Test is also quite realistical.
Thanks for the link! I enjoyed reading the article and statistics.
I think they may be a bit off on the prices for some of the repairs and used car guide. Other than that I thought it was a nice read.
I think they may be a bit off on the prices for some of the repairs and used car guide. Other than that I thought it was a nice read.
I think when they come up with these prices, they assume a certain mileage for each year.
They are probably assuming a 97 would have around 60k miles on it.
My 97 NSX just past 14k miles. In the end, the car is worth how much someone is willing to pay.
For a low mileage 91 NSX in excellent condition (show car condition), I could see that fetching around 35k.
I think the high cost of the current NSX has helped stabilize the earlier model prices because folks assume the earlier models cost that much as well.
If they stop producing the NSX, then I would expect the prices of the NSX to shoot up because it will be harder to find.
If you take into account all the "totalled" NSXs out there, it makes it more difficult to find a good model each year. Just the lack of NSXs will drive the price up.
William
They are probably assuming a 97 would have around 60k miles on it.
My 97 NSX just past 14k miles. In the end, the car is worth how much someone is willing to pay.
For a low mileage 91 NSX in excellent condition (show car condition), I could see that fetching around 35k.
I think the high cost of the current NSX has helped stabilize the earlier model prices because folks assume the earlier models cost that much as well.
If they stop producing the NSX, then I would expect the prices of the NSX to shoot up because it will be harder to find.
If you take into account all the "totalled" NSXs out there, it makes it more difficult to find a good model each year. Just the lack of NSXs will drive the price up.
William
- Joined
- 3 February 2000
- Messages
- 3,942
If you look at the numbers, they just reduce the price by X dollars per year, and reduce X as the years go back. $7500 a year, then $7000 a year, then $6500 a year, then $6000, then $5000, $4500, $4000, $3000, etc.
This is obviously useless. It just happens to match up around the '97 model year with real market pricing the same way a broken clock is right twice a day.
One also has to consider color combination and local availability. Here in the Midwest the cars are much harder to find than CA or FL, for example. Also, some people simply must have a black car, or red, or whatever - those colors thus get premium pricing.
------------------
Drive fast, but drive well. NSXCA #1672
------------------
Drive fast, but drive well. NSXCA #1672
Very well said Lud!!
0-60 in 5.8 sec.? That's still a good fraction of seconds off from pubished data for the 3.0 liter/5 speed version.
Oh well, at least they seemed to get most of it right. Great read.
Someone send those pin heads a link to this site. Based on those #'s for pricing most of the info is useless.
Here's what they had to say in the 2002 review:
U.S. NSX sales totaled just 182 units in calendar 2001, down from 221 the previous year and 238 in calendar '99. Despite these paltry numbers, Honda/Acura seems committed to continuing the NSX, if only as a technological showcase with great image rub-off for the rest of the lineup.
Regards.
U.S. NSX sales totaled just 182 units in calendar 2001, down from 221 the previous year and 238 in calendar '99. Despite these paltry numbers, Honda/Acura seems committed to continuing the NSX, if only as a technological showcase with great image rub-off for the rest of the lineup.
Regards.
This thing is such crap! As if I would sell my '94 w/29k for $27K? But, as long as were on the subject, I'd be willing to purchase any year prior to '95 with similar milage for what they list
'97+ looks close to correct but the earlier years...what a joke.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
