apapada said:...when people look back at you, disappointed that it ONLY has 270 horses ?...
That is utterly classic. I don't think there are very many cars made even today that are NA with that many horses.DocL said:Ask them which cars built in 1992 had over 270hp from a six cylinder naturally aspirated engine?
92NSX said:That is utterly classic. I don't think there are very many cars made even today that are NA with that many horses.
apapada said:Really ? here are five of them (from memory)
Acura TL S (3.2L 270)
Nissan 350 Z (3.5L 287)
Infinity G35 Coupe (3.5L 280)
BMW M3 (3.2L 333)
BMW 540 (4.4L 286)
should I continue ?
DocL said:The cars you listed were built in 1992 and all have a V6? I think you need to do some more research.
92NSX said:I don't think there are very many cars made even today that are NA with that many horses.
apapada said:
DocL said:The cars you listed were built in 1992 and all have a V6? I think you need to do some more research.
Your argument is irrelevant to this discussion. The post never mentioned anything about engine configuration/size and/or year. All the post said was:
92NSX said:That is utterly classic. I don't think there are very many cars made even today that are NA with that many horses.
Therefore, my research is just fine. Thank you very much.
DocL said:Ask them which cars built in 1992 had over 270hp from a six cylinder naturally aspirated engine?
apapada said:...when people look back at you, disappointed that it ONLY has 270 horses ?
Anyone can give me some nice comebacks ?
it's not that I'm not confident of my NSX or anything, just for the sake of discussion...
RyRy210 stated... Actually, DocL's post was made in reference to cars in '92 only / 92NSX made a different comment altogether, which is what I believe you were responding to.