Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Cd=0.32 may was not superior for today's standard but is was far more superior at the time the car showed up in the showroom. Compare it to a Porsche 911, even one of today. The aerodynamic shape of a 911 is completely wrong IMO. Back in the day they produced a high amount of lift, fitting big proletarian rear spoilers to get wrid even part of it. They may thought of flying is even faster than driving. When Honda sold only few NSXs they went to the air-tunnel again and brought a facelift model (02+) and they were even refining it for the NSX-R NA2, producing downforce without big ass-wings.There are plenty of (understandably written) articles on aerodynamics in this source. The most impressive ones are those who work on the underbody and test it on the road.
Cd=0.32 may was not superior for today's standard but is was far more superior at the time the car showed up in the showroom. Compare it to a Porsche 911, even one of today. The aerodynamic shape of a 911 is completely wrong IMO. Back in the day they produced a high amount of lift, fitting big proletarian rear spoilers to get wrid even part of it. They may thought of flying is even faster than driving.
When Honda sold only few NSXs they went to the air-tunnel again and brought a facelift model (02+) and they were even refining it for the NSX-R NA2, producing downforce without big ass-wings.
There are plenty of (understandably written) articles on aerodynamics in this source. The most impressive ones are those who work on the underbody and test it on the road.
