More space to do maintenance requires more 'space' which makes the car bigger and maybe heavier. Everything is a trade-off. Things might have been better if Honda had not adopted the C 90deg block for the NSX. The J block fits in the NSX. I have only seen pictures of the J engine in an NSX and it is an SOHC engine so the heads are smaller; but, I expect that maintenance would probably be much, much easier with the more compact engine angle.
You can find higher strength fibers for the belt; but, trying to extend the life of the rubbers in the matrix that holds those fibers probably isn't going to happen. Rather than trying to develop some super long life timing belt, the more interesting option might have been to try a chain drive; but, chains have their own set of issues. On a 90 deg V DOHC engine do you try for one massively long chain or do two separate chains to each head? On some of its V4 motorcycle engines Honda used gear drives for the camshafts. Noted for being noisy and I think (although I don't really keep track any more) Honda has largely abandoned gear drive for cams. As a side note, one of the V4 motorcycles that Honda used gear drives on was the ultra rare 1992 NR750. Gear drive was perhaps the least of the engine oddities since it was equipped with oval dual connecting rod pistons with 8 valves per cylinder. Specific claimed power output was a mind buggering 160hp/l at 15,000 RPM. If you think spare parts are getting hard to find for the NSX, the 200 -300 unit production run for the NR750 probably means that every spare part is custom manufactured.
As a final note to maintenance related whining, embrace the fact that you are not a Ferrari 355 owner. Tight working conditions are not a problem because engine out timing belt maintenance is the only option. Timing belt replacement is part of the major maintenance procedure for the 355 which used to be around $10k when carried out by a Ferrari authorized facility - I briefly flirted with 355 ownership before checking out the long term ownership issues.