Old guy doesn't need reinforcement, but no matter what the availability, on any car you should never ever simply replace the disc/disc's. In the old days we could have a machine shop "reface" the flywheel and pressure plate and use just a new disc, but in our case it would require four surfaces to be refaced and those old "clutch shops" with the expertise are simply gone. In case you didn't already know (which you likely do), growing up in the US V-8's drag crowd you could do a "clutch dump" with 350 ft lbs or so of torgue 50-60 times before you damaged your clutch. With the nsx/ porches/ferrari's you likely get about a half dozen "clutch dumps" before you have seriously degraded or "glazed" the surfaces to where it will slip. Can't understand why all these outstanding engineering groups would design clutches FAR inferior to a stock 56 Chevy? Back in the "day" when modern engineering software was not in use (except in aviation) instead of engineering a system, systems were often WAY overdesigned ( perhaps maybe 400%) as cost/weight/efficiency was not an issue. From what i understand Honda works at around a 20% safety factor. That is really tight thus these "drag" starts are simply not on the table without a yearly rebuild. Not insinuating ones habits, but i have seen a lot of folks in various high end sports cars that think they can certainly do a burn out now and then, right? Not so IMO, not even on most aftermarket offerings. Same goes for "powershifting". While personally my street race or burn out days are well in the past, I do kind of resent that i can't ever "abuse" my NSX clutch a bit (my old drag race friends think i'm now a wuss). I'm sure drift folks may have contrary opinions, just my individual experience. PS -clutch fluid needs replaced now and then. I remember my first fluid change at around 10k it looked like coffee.