In case anyone a pristine one - '91 with just over 6k miles.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/scz/cto/3034682601.html
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/scz/cto/3034682601.html
Aptos is only 40 mins away from me. If someone is VERY serious and needs a member to take a look I can do so. I am usually in the area on Tuesday and Friday's after 5PM.
Frankly, IMHO I would rather buy a newer model with 30-40K miles for a few grand more.
Check the maintenance schedule and history of ownership
Consider that this is a much lower mileage 91 that you can get for $30K
and it may not need the usual $2-5K of deferred maintenance/worn out parts, etc.
I'd say anything in the 35K-36K range is a fair price, perhaps even the asking price since it looks like its bone stock and in very good shape
Either way, get a full PPI and leakdown test
I seen that car advertise on craiglist for past week, it originally said 62,000 mile not sure if 6k is a typo.
Unless there is odometer fraud, I think the 62,000 miles was a typo. The picture of the odometer reads 6,206 and 8/10 miles.
If a "full PPI" is done without issue, why do a leakdown test?
For that price, I'd go for a 95+ with higher miles. Targa top, color matched roof and updated wheels make the NSX look soooo much better.
Actually, when I first saw the ad, I thought it was suspiciously cheap
Me too!
Not sure why you guys think that way. A low mileage NA2 is only going for low to mid 40s, so I think a 6K mile 91 for close to 40K is not cheap at all!
+1. Unless you're looking for a garage queen/show car to display in a museum (and not drive), I'd take an NA2 too. I guess that's the NSX owner's dilema. The only solution is to buy two!
A low mileage NA2 is only going for low to mid 40s...
Not sure why you guys think that way. A low mileage NA2 is only going for low to mid 40s....
For that price, I'd go for a 95+ with higher miles. Targa top, color matched roof and updated wheels make the NSX look soooo much better.
I personally would settle for a Targa just to have the 6-Speed and 3.2, but I'm also having a really hard time convincing myself to let go of my 53K mile 92 Coupe with mod friendly OBD1 and cable throttle for that 6-Speed and 3.2 with 20 more HP.
With an NSX like that, it is really rare. The main advantage of only 7k miles on a car that old is just how perfect the body must be - probably not a single rock chip on the thing. 40k is out of my budget, which is why I picked up a 91 with 100k miles on it, much more affordable :smile:
Who would let a car like that sit for so long...
Cars that have been driven just a few hundred miles without proper protection (nose mask, clear bra) will probably have some rock chip on them already, let alone 7K miles. This is more true for NSX since the car sits so low to the ground.