FORD has engine trouble.. including GT

Joined
23 October 2000
Messages
13,885
Location
Saint Augustine, FL
I got this off Ferrari Chat....



HOT OFF THE PRESS 05 Mustang stop shipment
Ford Orders Stop Shipment Of 2005 Trucks, Mustang Due To Defective Engines -
Ford GT "40" Alleged To Have Defective Cylinder Heads
07 September 2004
Dearborn, Michigan.
Robert Lane

Sources at one of Ford's engine plants told BlueOvalNews that Ford Motor Company has instructed assembly plants to stop shipping certain 2005 model year vehicles because they can contain defective 4.6L or 5.4L engines. BlueOvalNews was first altered to the problem after we received a news tip at the end of August.

The products that can contain the defective engines include the 2005 Ford Mustang GT, 2005 F-Series, 2005 F-Series Super Duty, Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator. Ford has instructed the assembly plants to stop shipping vehicles until they are screened to see if they contain the defective engines. It is not known if any products were shipped to consumers before the problem was noticed.

The 2005 model year 4.6L and 5.4L engines in question were built with defective cylinder heads. According to sources, the defective cylinder heads will have an adverse effect on performance and will cause the engine to fail to meet Ford's specifications.

It's not immediately clear if Ford will replace the entire engine at the assembly plant or just replace the defective cylinder heads and approve the vehicle for shipment to customers.

A Team Mustang source told BlueOvalNews that a stop shipment order means that Ford won't ship GT Mustangs to dealers, but it doesn't mean that Ford will stop building Mustangs - they can still build V6 powered models until problems with the 4.6L engines are corrected. Further, even though Ford officially launched JOB1 of the Mustang today, shipments don't occur immediately. "Somewhere within two weeks after Job #1 we have an OK to ship meeting where all the upper management on the program proclaim the vehicle is OK to ship. . . .launching a new vehicle in a new plant can have its issues. That's just part of what a launch is all about.", said our source.

In what could prove to be the most devesting news; however, is that the Ford GT "40" is alleged to have cylinder heads that contain defects in the combustion chamber pocket area. According to sources, Ford is allegedly making design changes to the cylinder head and will create a new casting which is targeted for release by 01 January 2005. Rather than issue a recall for the Ford GT, Ford would most likely issue a TSB (technical service bulletin) and repair the vehicles only as needed. Look for an update on the GT heads at a later date
 
F - First
O - on
R - Race
D - Day
:D
 
I would still like to have one of the defective GT's. :D
 
NetViper said:
I got this off Ferrari Chat....
BlueOvalNews was first altered to the problem after we received a news tip at the end of August.

I would question the source when they have a glaring error in one of the first sentences.

I think they meant alerted and not altered, I don't think I would give this source too much credibility.

And even if this is true, it sounds like they caught the problem pretty early. Not like Acura that had the snap ring problem in a large number of transmissions.

I will take one of those Ford GT's anyday before I would buy a Ferrari again. I receieved a recall for my '87 Testarossa a few months ago because the seat belts have probllems. Ferrari = Junk!
 
Carguy! said:
I would question the source when they have a glaring error in one of the first sentences.

I think they meant alerted and not altered, I don't think I would give this source too much credibility.

And even if this is true, it sounds like they caught the problem pretty early. Not like Acura that had the snap ring problem in a large number of transmissions.

I will take one of those Ford GT's anyday before I would buy a Ferrari again. I receieved a recall for my '87 Testarossa a few months ago because the seat belts have probllems. Ferrari = Junk!

I would question the source when there is a glaring error in the last sentence.

Just kidding around. Don't flame on me.
 
At least they caught it themselves and will fix it, as opposed to the "Ultimate Driving Machine" who tried to ignore their problems for over a year and blame it on their customers. :(

F= F'ed
O= over
R= rebuilt
D= Dodge

Yes I own one, a 94 Lightning. First and last Ford purchase.

But I'd still take a GT-40, even with poor quality!!!
 
Don't get me wrong with this but I have to defend Ford for financial reasons.

Having the #1 selling vehicle for the past umpteen consecutive years can't be a bad thing.
I bet any other manufacturer in the world would love to claim that.
 
F - F@#king
O - Owner
R - Really
D - Dumb

Not my opinion, just repeating something I heard once.
 
I don't see what the big deal is here. They put out a TSB, get the cars fixed, and it is over with right? It is a little bit of a pain, but it is not like it is doomed.
 
Ford has engine troubles? No kidding. Who woulda thunk it?
 
beckertb said:
With any luck, maybe a few of the earlier car's owners will not take delivery so I can get mine sooner. I hope they get some more bad press :D

Ben


Me too! I find it funny that people find fault with a company that finds a problem and fixes it before the majority of them go out. I think they handled the situation quite well and should be applauded, but if I can get my GT sooner than that is Ok too.
 
beckertb said:
With any luck, maybe a few of the earlier car's owners will not take delivery so I can get mine sooner. I hope they get some more bad press :D

Ben

I agree with you and am glad some people can see the good side to things instead of being so negative. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top