Wow, what a terrible ergonomically fitting car. The British are decades behind Japanese interior styling. Sitting in it I felt as if I was sitting from a 80’s domestic...seating position is too low and the dash is too high with poor visibility all around.
The gauges are made by VDO and are the bare essentials...I would think a $80k+ turbo exotic would have a full dash! No boost, no oil psi and no volts. And a tach with no redline?? (Just for your FYI, the tachs go to 8k but redline is around 7200, yes, it's difficult to manage).
It did have a Alpine head unit with speakers and I thought because of the brand that it would have decent sound quality...wrong again. Highs are good but no mids and NO bass.
It has cheap push buttons for the parking lights, headlights and these hard-pressed window switches. I believe the car is hand built? For its sake, I hope it is because it creeks and cracks a lot. The seats, the dash especially and this car only has 8900 miles! My 93 NSX feels like a 2005 in comparison!
The shifter is like rowing a boat, long sloppy throws that are nowhere nearly refined as the NSX or S2000 (which I feel is a one up on the NSX). The clutch could build your leg muscles if you did reps of 10 every day for a few minutes.
Exterior Styling...Sexy car however for a 2002, I would expect HIDs and flush headlights...those two key things make it a little dated. I love the big wheels and accompanying big brakes. The rear wings looks at home too.
Performance...It lags...bad. But then the boost builds up! ...And then you must shift which again is sloppy so you loose that little bit of boost smile you had. I agree with the published numbers. it feels as fast as a 3.2 NSX and as light, great handling too but I felt a but more confidence in the NSX...maybe because I have more seat time.
Any one else ever drive one? Am I way off? I try not to be biased with any car that I drive.
The gauges are made by VDO and are the bare essentials...I would think a $80k+ turbo exotic would have a full dash! No boost, no oil psi and no volts. And a tach with no redline?? (Just for your FYI, the tachs go to 8k but redline is around 7200, yes, it's difficult to manage).
It did have a Alpine head unit with speakers and I thought because of the brand that it would have decent sound quality...wrong again. Highs are good but no mids and NO bass.
It has cheap push buttons for the parking lights, headlights and these hard-pressed window switches. I believe the car is hand built? For its sake, I hope it is because it creeks and cracks a lot. The seats, the dash especially and this car only has 8900 miles! My 93 NSX feels like a 2005 in comparison!
The shifter is like rowing a boat, long sloppy throws that are nowhere nearly refined as the NSX or S2000 (which I feel is a one up on the NSX). The clutch could build your leg muscles if you did reps of 10 every day for a few minutes.
Exterior Styling...Sexy car however for a 2002, I would expect HIDs and flush headlights...those two key things make it a little dated. I love the big wheels and accompanying big brakes. The rear wings looks at home too.
Performance...It lags...bad. But then the boost builds up! ...And then you must shift which again is sloppy so you loose that little bit of boost smile you had. I agree with the published numbers. it feels as fast as a 3.2 NSX and as light, great handling too but I felt a but more confidence in the NSX...maybe because I have more seat time.
Any one else ever drive one? Am I way off? I try not to be biased with any car that I drive.